Going beyond Code ground requirements

Status
Not open for further replies.

paulengr

Senior Member
My employer is very aggressive about grounding. This year, they dropped the corporate standards for grounding down to less than 1 ohm from the equipment to the transformer neutral, and 5 ohms from the transformer to Earth ground.

We're a sand mine, and the ground itself is absolutely lousy. BUT...we've met those requirements.

On the transformer ground rods, we got the threaded ones and simply drove one rod after another down until the readings dropped to below 25 ohms. As the dirt settled back in within a week, the readings dropped down to less than 5 ohms. Only had to come back and add an extra ground rod once.

As for the equipment, mostly we ended up adding lots of external grounds. Usually, the problem wasn't with the wiring itself. It was with the structure which after 25 years or so of rust simply wasn't all that well bonded anymore. So adding external ground supplemental ground wiring was simply easier and cheaper than trying to actually find the problems in the existing wiring.

It sort of makes sense to meet these requirements as well. Think about it. Most of the equipment is 460V. The Code requirement is less than 25 ohms. Even at 20 ohms, that means that you could have a fault current of I=V/R=23 amps. That's fine for your house but in an industrial setting, most motors are substantially larger than that. A 60 amp breaker or fuse wouldn't ever detect the fault, leaving you with a continuous current draw across the ground.
 
Re: Going beyond Code ground requirements

Unless you are speaking of medium voltage systems (let us say 4160 volts or higher), then the ground rod is not intended to be part of a fault clearing path. It can help conduct a lighting strike into planet Earth, and it can help create a low impedance connection between all grounded points within the facility, but it cannot help clear a fault. Your mathematical discussion is perfectly valid, and it serves to prove this point.
 
Re: Going beyond Code ground requirements

Paulengr,

Did you pick up the ufer thread next to yours? The Ufer may be a good answer to soil conditions when the concrete foundation cures for a lower resistant "bond" into the soil? Rod erosion is not an issue, only lightning strikes. :D

rbj, Seattle
 
Re: Going beyond Code ground requirements

charlie b,
On a different note, why is it that on medium voltage systems, the ground rod might be considered part of the fault clearing path ?

I always follow the conventional equipment grounding rules for 600V. & below on medium voltage systems. I had always believed that NEC intends same basic equipment grounding rules to medium voltage.
 
Re: Going beyond Code ground requirements

Just do the math. Plug in a voltage like 7620 or 7200 into ohms law with about 25 ohms of resistance. You will get enough current flow to open most cutouts. :D
 
Re: Going beyond Code ground requirements

By the way, we measure all of our ground rods and drive up to three coupled vertically if we don't get 25 ohms. Most of the time we get 25 ohms on the first rod. :D
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top