Grandfathering (clause)

Status
Not open for further replies.

Allen77

Member
Location
Georgia
There has been great discussion at work about, if you go in to update or modify an electrical issue and you discover that there are other issues not up to the code standards. At that time does the responsibility fall on the person doing the work to correct the code violation. If so could you provide where it is in the code book.
 
Last edited:
I know of no place the NEC addresses the issue. It has been my experience that requirements vary from jurisdiction to jurisdiction.
Most areas I am familiar with require the work you install follow present Code and obvious safety issues be addressed.
Some I see require GFCI upgrades to current code.
 
Vesting is a better term to use.
The code (edition) that applies to a permit is the code in effect on the day the permit is applied for.
Let's assume for discussion purposes that the building you're speaking of was built lawfully with a permit to which some code edition applied.
That code edition applies to that permit for the life of the permit.
The building is vested to that standard for the life of the building with very few exceptions (i.e. an ordinance requiring smoke detectors in all residential occupancies).
So now let's assume you want to add on to that building - let's say we're adding on an in-laws suite.
All new work must meet new code (let's use GFCI as the example). The new restroom will have GFCI. Generally speaking, you don't have to go through the original part of the building and change that out to GFCI.
But in doing this project, you're adding load to the project. Let's assume you need a service change to handle the larger load. The new service must meet new code (the code edition on the date you applied for the permit to build the addition).
But everything else in the old part of the building is vested to that old code edition.

So in summary, all new work must meet current code and any impact on existing work must be addressed. When new work has no impact on old work, that old work is still vested. Exceptions might be change in occupancy classification or expansion of 50% area or dollar value, depending on where the project is located.
 
Grandfathering is an AHJ issue not a code issue, the NEC only has limited places that involve any form of "grandfathering" though that term is not actually used in the NEC. One is the application of a three wire circuit instead of a four wire circuit for electric ranges or clothes dryers, and makes it fairly clear that an older installation is allowed to meet an older code standard if certain conditions exist, otherwise the newer standard is the standard, and all new installations or modifications outside of any exceptions must meet the newer standards.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top