Ground Conductor Parallel Feed

Status
Not open for further replies.
J

Jay Pai

Member
I have an existing application: 800A feed with (2) 3/C 500kcmil with a #2 gnd (does not comply with code). 800A equipment requires a #1/0 gnd. In order to comply, can i run a grounding conductor "outside" of multiconductor cable without having to special order cable with a #1/0 gnd?
 
hm

hm

Jay Pai said:
I have an existing application: 800A feed with (2) 3/C 500kcmil with a #2 gnd (does not comply with code). 800A equipment requires a #1/0 gnd. In order to comply, can i run a grounding conductor "outside" of multiconductor cable without having to special order cable with a #1/0 gnd?
Click to expand...

1234567890

250.122 (F) Conductors in Parallel. Where conductors are run in
parallel in multiple raceways or cables as permitted in
310.4, the equipment grounding conductors, where used,
shall be run in parallel in each raceway or cable.
Click to expand...
 
hm

hm

Jay Pai said:
I have an existing application: 800A feed with (2) 3/C 500kcmil with a #2 gnd (does not comply with code). 800A equipment requires a #1/0 gnd. In order to comply, can i run a grounding conductor "outside" of multiconductor cable without having to special order cable with a #1/0 gnd?
Click to expand...

It says minimum message length is 10 chars. I guess it does not count stuff inside quotes.

250.122 (F) Conductors in Parallel. Where conductors are run in
parallel in multiple raceways or cables as permitted in
310.4, the equipment grounding conductors, where used,
shall be run in parallel in each raceway or cable.
Click to expand...
 
You could use the existing cables with a GFPE device on the feeder if it meets the requirements of 250.122(F)(2).
 
This is where I am getting hung up..."in each raceway or cable". I interpret raceway to be for single conductor applications and not multiconductor. Therefore ground must be enclosed with supply conductors.

I have seen installations with a separate gnd conductor "wrapped" around multiconductor, looks goofy.
 
Jay Pai said:
This is where I am getting hung up..."in each raceway or cable". I interpret raceway to be for single conductor applications and not multiconductor. Therefore ground must be enclosed with supply conductors.

I have seen installations with a separate gnd conductor "wrapped" around multiconductor, looks goofy.
Click to expand...

Its probably safe but I don't believe it meets the requirement about the ground conductor being IN the cable.
 
250.122(F)(2)(3) The ground-fault protection is listed for the purpose of protecting the equipment grounding conductor.
Click to expand...
Are there any ground fault devices that are listed for this purpose?
Don
 
Wrapping Ground Makes a Cable

Wrapping Ground Makes a Cable

"I have seen installations with a separate gnd conductor "wrapped" around multiconductor, looks goofy."

"Its probably safe but I don't believe it meets the requirement about the ground conductor being IN the cable."

I think it could be considered that when a ground conductor is wrapped around a cable, the assembly comprises a new cable. Therefore, the ground conductor is part of (IN) the new cable.

Three wires together (triplex) is cable, and it doesn't have a jacket around all. The wrap serves the purpose of preventing someone from disconnecting one end and discarding it without knowing that it is associated with the other conductors.
 
Bob NH said:
"I have seen installations with a separate gnd conductor "wrapped" around multiconductor, looks goofy."

"Its probably safe but I don't believe it meets the requirement about the ground conductor being IN the cable."

I think it could be considered that when a ground conductor is wrapped around a cable, the assembly comprises a new cable. Therefore, the ground conductor is part of (IN) the new cable.

Three wires together (triplex) is cable, and it doesn't have a jacket around all. The wrap serves the purpose of preventing someone from disconnecting one end and discarding it without knowing that it is associated with the other conductors.
Click to expand...

I don't see that at all.

A cable assembly is a factory assembly. You can't just wrap something around it and claim it is good to go, unless you are going to get UL to list it that way. :D

<added>
If you look in the code book in chapter 3, every cable is defined. generally they are defined similar to the definition of NM cable.

Nonmetallic-Sheathed Cable. A factory assembly of two
or more insulated conductors having an outer sheath of
nonmetallic material.
Click to expand...

Note that it is a factory assembly, not something you made up in the field. Note the conductors are located inside the sheath, not outside.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top