Psychojohn said:
Why don't they make combination AFCI/GFCI breakers, that can be used to meet both needs.
One can only guess why.
My guess is that this is a business decision, possibly
based on there being a higher (I'm guessing) cost
to manufacture a device that met both AFCI and
(specifically 5 mA) GFCI requirements. It has been
pointed out above that in those (relatively rare)
situations where GFCI is needed where AFCI is
required (e.g. wet bar in master suite), the need
can be met with GFCI receptacles on AFCI breakers.
My guess is that there are not enough #'s of these
cases to justify the investment for the manufacturers.
Or, more cynically, they may just want to continue
to sell both devices because that makes more profit.
I don't know for sure.
I have been wondering about this topic because I have
been told that AFCI breakers will trip at the 30mA level
with ground faults, and I have indeed had to clear ground
faults in AFCI circuits, after which the circuit functioned
fine, so indeed did seem to have "ground fault functionality".
Apparently, not at the 5 mA level, e.g. I searched Square-D's
AFCI documentation:
http://ecatalog.squared.com/pubs/Ci...-QOB Circuit Breakers/QO-AFI/48840-248-01.pdf
which explicitly says:
This product does not meet the
requirements for Class A ground-fault
circuit protection.
even though it goes on to say:
This arc-fault detection device is not
designed or intended for use on circuits
in which the neutral conductor is shared
with other circuits. The circuit breaker
will nuisance trip in “shared neutral”
circuits.
which is a big hint that it could trip on ground faults.
My total guess is that the "non-Class A" ground fault
functionality (perhaps because of not being 5mA,
perhaps because of other reasons of which I am unaware)
came for close to "free" in the AFCI device. Perhaps
it was more costly to make it trip at 5mA, or maybe
they wanted to keep separate products, I don't know.
So, that's my speculation, but I don't think you can take
it to the bank.