spearxspark
Member
Hello all.I'm looking for some technical reasons for not using the bare conductor in nmc as the grounded/neutral conductor,in a residential circuit where the ground/neutral bar are one in the panel.Now before you start lickin your chops and trying to eat me alive, I know this is a code violation and the obvious reasons. I recently came across this situation while troubleshooting some receptacles.The old switched recept. dilemma,they want the lights switched but the alarm clock on.No problem if the feeds at the recept.just split the yoke and pigtail the hot.Well here's what I found.(by the way this area of the house was an addition,so who knows who wired it.)The 14/2 feed was at the switch,the hot went to one side of a single pole switch,the neutral was bonded to the metal box along with the bare ground.The 14/2 going to the recept. had the neutral being used as a constant hot to the recept.,the black as a switch leg to the recept. and the bare ground used as the neutral to the recept.,They were trying to get a split yoke, (switched/non switched receptacle) out of a two wire nmc with the feed at the switch.So here's the thing, it was working,it turns out that they just had the lamp plugged in to the constant yoke and the alarm clock into the switched yoke.Well I took everything apart and did the only thing I could without tearing apart the wall and adding a 14/3.(I did suggest this) I made the receptacle strictly a switched receptacle and stopped the bare conductor from being used as a neutral.What I'm looking for here is a good theory based explanation of the potential hazards that can be encountered when allowing this type of installation to go unnoticed.I beleive just knowing something is wrong, without completely understanding all the reasons why, is worthless.
Thanks for your time, hope to here some thoughts soon.
Thanks for your time, hope to here some thoughts soon.