jaylectricity
Senior Member
- Location
- Massachusetts
- Occupation
- licensed journeyman electrician
A customer is having the foundation poured for his pre-fab house. After the footings were poured the wire inspector drove by and stopped and told him he needs to embed at least 20' #4 copper in the foundation. There is no rebar to be placed in this foundation.
Looking at 250.52(A)(3), I see that is an acceptable method for the grounding electrode system/conductor, but wondered if it was in lieu of a ground rod, or in addition to one. I asked the inspector and he said that I would not have to drive a ground rod.
I'm fine with all of this, definitely much easier than the ground rod method, but I'm wondering if he can force me to do it this way. What if I wanted to drive a ground rod instead? The materials would be cheaper, and since I'd be the one doing the labor I wouldn't actually be spending money on labor.
What say you, forum?
Looking at 250.52(A)(3), I see that is an acceptable method for the grounding electrode system/conductor, but wondered if it was in lieu of a ground rod, or in addition to one. I asked the inspector and he said that I would not have to drive a ground rod.
I'm fine with all of this, definitely much easier than the ground rod method, but I'm wondering if he can force me to do it this way. What if I wanted to drive a ground rod instead? The materials would be cheaper, and since I'd be the one doing the labor I wouldn't actually be spending money on labor.
What say you, forum?