paullmullen
Senior Member
- Location
- Wisconsin
- Occupation
- Electrical Engineer & Master Electrician
I am designing the electrical system for an upcoming residential build. Because of the seasonal high water mark around the property, a good portion of the backfill around the house will be gravel. Furthermore, the walls of this home are being installed as precast off site so concrete encased electrode opportunities are only in a few scattered footing pads.
I'm trying to weigh options for the Grounding Electrode.
OPTION 1: 250.52(A)(5) Though I could put the usual rod electrodes into the gravel close to the basement walls, that probably doesn't really accomplish the connection to earth that such an electrode should provide.
OPTION 2: I could install the electrodes 25 feet away from the home and go into undisturbed soil, but then I have accessible connections sticking up out of the ground in the middle of the yard. A trip hazard for sure.
OPTION 3: I have a couple of footing pads that are in contact with undisturbed soil that seem perfect for a concrete encased electrode per 250.52(A)(3). But this would not be in a location close to the service disconnect. I would be stringing the GEC about 50' around the exterior of the house to get to the service entrance.
Though generally I have placed ground rods relatively close to the service entrance, I do not see any limits in the NEC on the length of the grounding electrode conductor. Did I miss a requirement?
QUESTION 1: Which option - of the ones above - would you recommend?
QUESTION 2: 250.68(A) Exc 1 reads An encased or buried connection to a concrete-encased, driven, or buried electrode shall not be required to be accessible. I had one inspector require accessibility of the connection to the ReBar regardless of this exception. In your opinions, can the grounding conductor clamp to the ReBar extending from the concrete pad be buried or not?
Thanks,
Paul
I'm trying to weigh options for the Grounding Electrode.
OPTION 1: 250.52(A)(5) Though I could put the usual rod electrodes into the gravel close to the basement walls, that probably doesn't really accomplish the connection to earth that such an electrode should provide.
OPTION 2: I could install the electrodes 25 feet away from the home and go into undisturbed soil, but then I have accessible connections sticking up out of the ground in the middle of the yard. A trip hazard for sure.
OPTION 3: I have a couple of footing pads that are in contact with undisturbed soil that seem perfect for a concrete encased electrode per 250.52(A)(3). But this would not be in a location close to the service disconnect. I would be stringing the GEC about 50' around the exterior of the house to get to the service entrance.
Though generally I have placed ground rods relatively close to the service entrance, I do not see any limits in the NEC on the length of the grounding electrode conductor. Did I miss a requirement?
QUESTION 1: Which option - of the ones above - would you recommend?
QUESTION 2: 250.68(A) Exc 1 reads An encased or buried connection to a concrete-encased, driven, or buried electrode shall not be required to be accessible. I had one inspector require accessibility of the connection to the ReBar regardless of this exception. In your opinions, can the grounding conductor clamp to the ReBar extending from the concrete pad be buried or not?
Thanks,
Paul