tilden
Member
- Location
- Chapel Hill, NC, USA
I'm currently talking with an inspector about what grounding requirements there are for a roof mounted array. My interpretation is I believe similar to this previous post
http://forums.mikeholt.com/showthread.php?t=156677&highlight=array+grounding
where in #8 at the end they say
It is my understanding that the ground from the inverter to array only needs to be an EGC, so it's sized via 690.45(A) which points to 250.122. The inspector is saying that we need a GEC all the way to the array, and that it would need to be sized per 250.166 with #8 minimum.
We did the install in a new house and they've already spray foamed and drywalled so it's not very easy for us at this point to just go put up an extra #8 ground and not worry about it anymore. If of course we do need to have a GEC running to the roof then so be it - but I'm just not seeing that as a requirement in the code. 690.47.(C).(3) is how we have the combined DC GEC and AC EGC between the AC panel and inverter.
I do realize that 690.43(C) says the array has to be bonded to the grounding system, and read on this page (Equipment Bonding Section, end of first FPN) from Mike that
http://ecmweb.com/code-basics/nec-rules-alternative-energy-systems-part-1
Finally - In this thread Sunking addresses this in post #33, saying
http://www.solarpaneltalk.com/showthread.php?10216-grounding-question-and-confusion/page4
The inspector is also saying it needs to be a GEC because the DC conductors are a DC system which requires a GEC all the way to the panels. I believe this would be for system grounding, but from what I read the system grounding can take place at essentially any point on the DC conductors per 690.42, including at the inverter, which is the case anyway with a ground fault protection system per the exception.
If I'm missing something I want to be sure I get it right so we can do future jobs correctly, but if the way I've ready everything is correct I want to be sure I provide ample support to this inspector as I want to be sure we get the right precedent set for others too.
http://forums.mikeholt.com/showthread.php?t=156677&highlight=array+grounding
where in #8 at the end they say
Under 2011 it definitely just needs to go from inverter to main.
It is my understanding that the ground from the inverter to array only needs to be an EGC, so it's sized via 690.45(A) which points to 250.122. The inspector is saying that we need a GEC all the way to the array, and that it would need to be sized per 250.166 with #8 minimum.
We did the install in a new house and they've already spray foamed and drywalled so it's not very easy for us at this point to just go put up an extra #8 ground and not worry about it anymore. If of course we do need to have a GEC running to the roof then so be it - but I'm just not seeing that as a requirement in the code. 690.47.(C).(3) is how we have the combined DC GEC and AC EGC between the AC panel and inverter.
I do realize that 690.43(C) says the array has to be bonded to the grounding system, and read on this page (Equipment Bonding Section, end of first FPN) from Mike that
but wasn't sure what justification I could tell my inspector that this doesn't need to be a GEC going back to the grounding system.this can be done via an equipment grounding conductor.
http://ecmweb.com/code-basics/nec-rules-alternative-energy-systems-part-1
Finally - In this thread Sunking addresses this in post #33, saying
which I can't figure out where this requirement comes from.However it is still required to bond the PV frames and racking directly to a GES with a dedicated GEC.
http://www.solarpaneltalk.com/showthread.php?10216-grounding-question-and-confusion/page4
The inspector is also saying it needs to be a GEC because the DC conductors are a DC system which requires a GEC all the way to the panels. I believe this would be for system grounding, but from what I read the system grounding can take place at essentially any point on the DC conductors per 690.42, including at the inverter, which is the case anyway with a ground fault protection system per the exception.
If I'm missing something I want to be sure I get it right so we can do future jobs correctly, but if the way I've ready everything is correct I want to be sure I provide ample support to this inspector as I want to be sure we get the right precedent set for others too.