I don't think it's a code violation. The downside is that if the customer trips one circuit then the other will trip unnecessarily.
But if it is a qo type 2-pole, he also wont have a separate disconnect for each circuit. there is only one switch to throw... no handle ties.If it's a "non" multi-wire circuit on a 2p breaker,then he wouldn't have a 2nd circuit to worry about tripping unnecessarily.
JAP>
There is no problem using a dp breaker for 2 single circuits.In a multi wire circuit I would need to use a handle tie or a 2 pole breaker. I am unable to get single pole 20 QO breakers, But I can get 2 pole 20's. Can I use a 2 pole breaker on a non multi wire circuit.
But if it is a qo type 2-pole, he also wont have a separate disconnect for each circuit. there is only one switch to throw... no handle ties.
sure you could. I could pull the handle tie off of a HomeLine 2P breaker... boom, 2 independent circuit breakers.You wouldn't have a separate disconnect for each circuit regardless of what brand of 2p breaker you were using.
JAP>
sure you could. I could pull the handle tie off of a HomeLine 2P breaker... boom, 2 independent circuit breakers.
No, a 2p or 3p has a small piece of metal or plastic that connects the trip mechanisms together.Here is a question not sure if it known here but I've seen a few mfg that have these 2 pole breakers that from the exterior look like it was just 2 single pole fastened together and with handle tie. Are they actually 2 singles on the inside?
As opposed to another type that is just a single handle but double size, is that internally the same? I've never took one apart.
No, a 2p or 3p has a small piece of metal or plastic that connects the trip mechanisms together.
That's what the "internal common trip" is. Wit or without a handle tie, all poles will trip together.
Correct.Then you would no longer have a 2 pole breaker.
JAP>
It would still be a 2pole... the breakers would be mechanically connect, just with the handle tie removed. But thats getting off topic.Then you would no longer have a 2 pole breaker.
JAP>
They would be common trip, which is not the same as mechanically connected in terms of manually opening and resetting after trip.It would still be a 2pole... the breakers would be mechanically connect, just with the handle tie removed. But thats getting off topic.
They would be common trip, which is not the same as mechanically connected in terms of manually opening and resetting after trip.
Curiosity asks: Once the common trip is triggered, do you have to reset (off-on) the handle on both sides to get even one pole to close?
I had an inspection today and the inspector told me even the twin breakers need handle ties ... Slaps head! Hard!
If you are referring to the tandem breaker no reason to, should never be used for MWBC, overloads the neutral.I had an inspection today and the inspector told me even the twin breakers need handle ties ... Slaps head! Hard!
Sent from my SM-G986U using Tapatalk
100% agree. No different than using a full size breakers and skipping a space with a MWBC. What would the inspector say to that installation? If he has any knowledge he would say no to that, he was not thinking, inspector speaking off the cuff and you can get poor advice. Would be interested in the inspectors reply if you call him to the question about a MWBC being on 2 breakers that skip a space putting them on the same buss .No, no, no! They can't share neutrals, so there's no reason. You should slap his head.