gar
Senior Member
- Location
- Ann Arbor, Michigan
- Occupation
- EE
110802-1005 EDT
I ran an experiment on the input energy to heat 1 quart of 75 F tap water to 200 F in a hot pot, with direct heater contact to the water, vs a GE microwave oven.
The hot pot was almost 100 % efficient in heating the water. This means the input electrical energy was just slightly more that the theoretical energy to heat the water. The microwave required about 2.25 times as much energy as the hot pot. Cost was less than $ 0.01 for the hot pot and about $ 0.02 for the microwave.
Does this mean you should use the hot pot instead of the microwave? Probably not.
This was just an interesting experiment and probably does not extrapolate to a roast in the microwave vs a standard oven.
.
I ran an experiment on the input energy to heat 1 quart of 75 F tap water to 200 F in a hot pot, with direct heater contact to the water, vs a GE microwave oven.
The hot pot was almost 100 % efficient in heating the water. This means the input electrical energy was just slightly more that the theoretical energy to heat the water. The microwave required about 2.25 times as much energy as the hot pot. Cost was less than $ 0.01 for the hot pot and about $ 0.02 for the microwave.
Does this mean you should use the hot pot instead of the microwave? Probably not.
This was just an interesting experiment and probably does not extrapolate to a roast in the microwave vs a standard oven.
.