Ok time for some fundamentals here.
Why do utilities use say 115 kV or 230 kV or even higher, AC or DC for power distribution? Isn’t that far higher voltage and just plain dangerous and scary? Why not distribute power at say 48 VDC,a common voltage used in phone systems for years? In fact Edison started with DC and even Tesla later suggested high voltage DC is the way to go. Much of the transmission system in the US Midwest is high voltage DC and it gets used elsewhere around the world. There is no technical reason we can’t switch to DC.
The answer is quite simple, First off regardless of whether it is AC or DC, losses in a power line are proportional to the square of the current. If we double the voltage, we cut the losses by 75% irrespective of whether it is DC or AC. Furthermore although there is a ton of active research on high frequency electronic transformers because they are smaller and have low losses in the transformer itself, the ROI and the losses in efficiency in the electronic conversion far exceeds the efficiency improvement in the transformer itself. Simply put, two coils of wire wound on a common iron core can easily exceed 99% efficiency compared to at best around 97% for DC conversion. So it is trivially simple and neatly lossless to transform up to a higher transmission voltage then down to lower distribution and finally utilization voltages with neatly unlimited power capability.
Now moving onto the converters a switching power supply converting from AC to DC can do so in a single stage using a very efficient and cheap device like an SCR or power FET and one capacitor on the output. A DC-DC conversion requires two stages of conversion with double the losses. Most devices involved have a 10 year or 100,000 hour life industrially or about 20% of that for consumer grade equipment compared to 30+ YEARS for even transformers. And the USB3 standard limits us to 48 VDC so we have over 4 times greater losses and the wattage isn’t enough to run a hair dryer, any laundry equipment, or most kitchen appliances.
If you don’t believe me then why is it that the vast majority of hotel USB ports that I visit don’t work? Or that I have to replace frequently used “wall warts” every couple years? The reliability on these things is astoundingly bad. I can’t even imagine an entire house full of them.
Plus if we get away from USB and just consider DC distribution in general don’t forget that although DC won’t kill you outright by causing heart fibrillation, it rips muscle tissue and breaks bones and unlike AC, it does not let go or knock you away. Fuses are twice as big and breakers 4 times larger because an AC circuit goes to zero Volts 120 times a second so it is trivially easy to shut down an AC circuit where with DC you literally have to pull the arc apart while energized. Large DC breakers are genuinely enormous. A 50 A DC breaker is about the size of a 1000 A AC breaker with no way to reduce the size…it’s physics at work.
So the simple answer is AC is used because it is simpler, cheaper, more efficient, and already established. DC has and continues to be around but has no compelling advantage.
Now keep in mind I’m no stranger to DC. My grand father was a telephone tech for over 50 years. I work on DC motors, generators, and drives a lot. It’s anything but foreign to me. And I strongly discourage DC distribution.