electrofelon
Senior Member
- Location
- Cherry Valley NY, Seattle, WA
I have draw up some formal plans for a job that requires plan review. Although I have worked off professionally done plans many times, I cant for the life of me remember how conductors are typically designated. Do we typically just give the sizes in decending order without noting which is neutral and EGC and assume it is clear that it is
phases->N->EGC? Or do we actually write in something like "(N)" and "(EGC)"? What about if I am using the raceway as the EGC? Here are a few examples:
1. 200A Three phase +N feeder in EMT with no wire EGC. Would you just write: (4) 3/0 THWN-2 CU
2. 200A three phase +#6 N + #6 EGC. Would you write: (3) 3/0, (2) #6 CU THWN-2 CU or (3) 3/0, #6 N, #6 EGC THWN-2
3. If its all going to be the same wire types, would you just put the "THWN-2" in the column heading and leave it out of each entry?
phases->N->EGC? Or do we actually write in something like "(N)" and "(EGC)"? What about if I am using the raceway as the EGC? Here are a few examples:
1. 200A Three phase +N feeder in EMT with no wire EGC. Would you just write: (4) 3/0 THWN-2 CU
2. 200A three phase +#6 N + #6 EGC. Would you write: (3) 3/0, (2) #6 CU THWN-2 CU or (3) 3/0, #6 N, #6 EGC THWN-2
3. If its all going to be the same wire types, would you just put the "THWN-2" in the column heading and leave it out of each entry?