I am in OKC, Oklahoma, and I am having an issue here with my AHJ regarding MCA and MOCPD in regards to AC units.
Mike has several videos throughout the years pertaining to this issue and I have learned a lot from them.
When there is a nameplate, the job is pretty easy...IMO
In This situation, I have a 8-2 NMB installed on a 50A breaker at the panel.
Nameplate rating MCA 22.3 MOCPD 50A. I got this information late and played what i thought was a safe call.
I have referred my AHJ to article 240.4(G), which refers to 440, parts lll and Vl.
They have no desire to hear our point of view. They simply refer to 334.80, my understanding is that 440 relieves us from the ampacity constraint here on the conductors.
Has anyone won this debate in writing, anyone have a clearer code path than I?
I am being told that it explicitly that I have no chance here by the chief electrical inspector. I have made they changes they asked for due to not wanting to hold up the project. This isn't me trying to cheap out, its me trying to now prove the chief wrong. Thanks in advance