If the ungrounded conductors increase in size from the minimum size, the EGC is supposes to increase proportionately as well, why?
Table 250.122 lists EGC sizes for overcurrent devices. Wouldn't this alone be used in determining the EGC?
:thumbsup: Sums up all of the discussions about this rule better than any I have seen so far.The idea of using that piece of #8 that has been laying around in the back of the truck just doesn't fly when 12 would be fine.
When does this rule come into play though?
For example, any OCPD from 30 - 60 A uses a #10 EGC. I can use #10, #8, or #6 ungrounded conductor and still use a #10 EGC. If I use a #10 then increase to a #6 in the future, but the breaker still remains in the 30 - 60 A range, does the EGC still need to increase? Because even though it is "increased" to a #6, you are still in the #10 EGC range anyway. Unless, I'm interpreting this rule wrong.
That is one instance that has not been clarified since they put that rule in.
I think if you have increased a 20 amp circuit to 10 AWG then you should increase the EGC to 10 AWG also - that one is maybe not so unclear, but if you have a 40 amp circuit and end up increasing conductors to 6 AWG instead of 8 AWG for "any" reason, it is not clear if the EGC needs increased also, because if you had same conductors but a 50 amp circuit - the EGC only needed to be 10 AWG in the first place. Clear as mud?