Increasing inverter high voltage setpoint

Status
Not open for further replies.
Has anyone had to do this? What is the process? I know for SMA they require a special code to change the settings, I have heard the utility needs to provide authorization. IS that true?
I have had to do this for some SMA inverters, and yes, SMA makes you jump through some hoops before they will give you access to that parameter, but no, I don't think I had to get anything from the POCO to show them.
 
I have had to do this for some SMA inverters, and yes, SMA makes you jump through some hoops before they will give you access to that parameter, but no, I don't think I had to get anything from the POCO to show them.
And out of curiosity, did you try the power company route first and they were unwilling to do anything? Or was there a lot of drop in the customer wiring?
 
And out of curiosity, did you try the power company route first and they were unwilling to do anything? Or was there a lot of drop in the customer wiring?
The issue was (and still is, I guess) the voltage rise between the building and the pole mounted transformer on cool clear days when the AC was not running; we raised the top operating voltage on the inverters and the problem went away.
 
The issue was (and still is, I guess) the voltage rise between the building and the pole mounted transformer on cool clear days when the AC was not running; we raised the top operating voltage on the inverters and the problem went away.
I think what electrofelon was asking (and which I'm now curious about) is whether you tried to get the POCO to make some changes to their equipment to address the problem. E.g. if the voltage delta at the service panel, between "maximum load" and "minimum load / maximum PV export" was too large (comparable to exceeding the size of the inverter voltage window), then the POCO could have upsized the service drop to alleviate that. Or if the voltage delta was reasonable, but the range was offset from the inverter voltage window, they might have been able to change taps at the transformer to move the supply voltage lower to get it within the inverter window at both extremes.

Cheers, Wayne
 
I think what electrofelon was asking (and which I'm now curious about) is whether you tried to get the POCO to make some changes to their equipment to address the problem. E.g. if the voltage delta at the service panel, between "maximum load" and "minimum load / maximum PV export" was too large (comparable to exceeding the size of the inverter voltage window), then the POCO could have upsized the service drop to alleviate that. Or if the voltage delta was reasonable, but the range was offset from the inverter voltage window, they might have been able to change taps at the transformer to move the supply voltage lower to get it within the inverter window at both extremes.

Cheers, Wayne
Yeah. We were talking about high voltages back in this thread:


But that was more a macro scale and policy discussion. Gunny did mention what is probably the same system he brought up here post number 52. Just curious on how successful people have been getting the power company to fix a high voltage issue, or if you don't bother and just raise the voltage set points at the inverter.
 
I think what electrofelon was asking (and which I'm now curious about) is whether you tried to get the POCO to make some changes to their equipment to address the problem. E.g. if the voltage delta at the service panel, between "maximum load" and "minimum load / maximum PV export" was too large (comparable to exceeding the size of the inverter voltage window), then the POCO could have upsized the service drop to alleviate that. Or if the voltage delta was reasonable, but the range was offset from the inverter voltage window, they might have been able to change taps at the transformer to move the supply voltage lower to get it within the inverter window at both extremes.

Cheers, Wayne
I understood what he asked and I answered it, I believe. No, we did not.
 
Yeah. We were talking about high voltages back in this thread:


But that was more a macro scale and policy discussion. Gunny did mention what is probably the same system he brought up here post number 52. Just curious on how successful people have been getting the power company to fix a high voltage issue, or if you don't bother and just raise the voltage set points at the inverter.
We did approach another POCO for a similar situation, to no avail. They said that their supply voltage, although somewhat high, was within their guaranteed window of operation, end of discussion. Our PV system used a stepdown transformer to convert the 480V inverter voltage to the 208V service voltage, so we buck-boosted it.
 
As long as the utility provides a voltage at the POCC that meets the ANSI C84-1 requirements they don't really care if it causes problems with a PV system high voltage limit. Now if their voltage falls outside the standard they can be compelled to fix the issue.
Inverters are generally set to a high voltage limit that is less than the IEEE 1547 high voltage limit. So there is often some room to increase the setting. But if it's already set at the IEEE 1547 limit then that's it.
 
As long as the utility provides a voltage at the POCC that meets the ANSI C84-1 requirements they don't really care if it causes problems with a PV system high voltage limit. Now if their voltage falls outside the standard they can be compelled to fix the issue.
Inverters are generally set to a high voltage limit that is less than the IEEE 1547 high voltage limit. So there is often some room to increase the setting. But if it's already set at the IEEE 1547 limit then that's it.
Do you know what these values are? I have looked but it doesnt seem black and white as there are several different ranges within the standard. You typical 240 single phase inverter comes with a high setting of 264. Can I go higher than that?
 
As long as the utility provides a voltage at the POCC that meets the ANSI C84-1 requirements they don't really care if it causes problems with a PV system high voltage limit. Now if their voltage falls outside the standard they can be compelled to fix the issue.
Inverters are generally set to a high voltage limit that is less than the IEEE 1547 high voltage limit. So there is often some room to increase the setting. But if it's already set at the IEEE 1547 limit then that's it.
In the case I was discussing earlier where we upped the voltage window we had a bank of 10 SMA SB 7000's. On cool clear days when the customer was not running the AC and the PV system was running flat out, the inverters would start tripping off one at a time until the voltage rise would abate enough for the rest to keep running. It took us a while to figure out what was happening because the dropouts were different inverters every time it happened. Live and learn.
 
the ANSI C84-1 requirements . . . the IEEE 1547 high voltage limit.
Do I understand correctly that the former, for utility maximum voltage at the point of service (presumably under no load/no export conditions), is 105% of nominal, and the latter maximum voltage, for the inverter, is 110% of nominal?

Cheers, Wayne
 
Now if their voltage falls outside the standard they can be compelled to fix the issue.
Maybe.
I know of a case (not PV-related) where a utility voltage was out of spec on the high side (255 - 260 on a 240V service) that caused certain EVs to have a charge fault. Utility basically told everyone to pound sand. The EV manufacturer had to make a software change to the allow the out of spec voltage.
 
Do I understand correctly that the former, for utility maximum voltage at the point of service (presumably under no load/no export conditions), is 105% of nominal, and the latter maximum voltage, for the inverter, is 110% of nominal?

Cheers, Wayne
I'm looking at a data sheet for a family of inverters we use frequently - the SMA Core 1 series. The "stock" phase to neutral/ground voltage range is from 244V to 305V; 305V is 110% of 277V.
 
Do I understand correctly that the former, for utility maximum voltage at the point of service (presumably under no load/no export conditions), is 105% of nominal, and the latter maximum voltage, for the inverter, is 110% of nominal?

Cheers, Wayne
I am very confused about these values. I think there are different standards and in my experience most utilities will provide a much tighter voltage tolerance than +10%. I cant imagine a utility saying 264 is fine.
 
I am very confused about these values. I think there are different standards and in my experience most utilities will provide a much tighter voltage tolerance than +10%. I cant imagine a utility saying 264 is fine.
Right, my brief search on ANSI C84-1 for the utility service requirements was that the max voltage was +5% (or +5.8%, not sure when that would apply). And the inverter standard IEEE 1547 allows up to +10%. So that would give you at least 5% (or 4.2%) for your voltage rise, if the utility supply had zero impedance.

However, if the ANSI C84-1 standard for the utility is at the point of service, and only regulates the voltage during load conditions to +/-5%, you could have a high enough impedance on the utility side to cause you trouble. E.g. the voltage at the point of service could be +5% at zero load, and -5% at full nominal load. Then if you had inverters trying to (net) export half nominal load, the voltage at the point of service would be at +10%, leaving no margin for voltage rise on the premises wiring.

Is there no standard for how stiff the utility supply needs to be?

Cheers, Wayne
 
Is there no standard for how stiff the utility supply needs to be?

Cheers, Wayne
As far as I know, no. The system I am having issues right now, we have been going back and forth with the POCO guy a bunch, and he keeps saying stuff like "end of a long radial line", "not much other load around there....". But I'm just thinking well that is probably true, but as far as I know that is not a valid reason to do nothing. Im sure the POCO doesnt like it but it is what it is.
 
ANSI C84-1 provides a number of voltages and it can be confusing. To start with there are Range A and Range B voltages and in these ranges, there are service and utilization voltages. Service voltage is what the utility has to supply at the service entrance. The utilization voltage is the voltage that electrical equipment should be designed to operate on.
Range A is the normal voltage and infrequent excursions to Range B are allowed. Range B is the voltage range outside of Range A that can occur on a limited basis but needs to be corrected in a reasonable time back to Range A.
For 240V single phase the Range A service voltage is 126/252 to 114/228V. The Range A utilization voltage is 126/252 to 110/220V. Equipment designed to the Range A utilization voltages will operate over the Range A service voltages.
Range B service is 127/254 to 110/220V and Range B utilization voltage is 127/254 to 106/212V.
 
OK, so if the utility needs to provide at worst Range B service at 127/254V maximum voltage, and IEEE 1547 allows the inverter to operate at up to 132/264, that always leave a nominal margin of 5/10V for premises voltage rise.

Except for the issue of utility side impedance. Does ANSI C84-1 only regulate the service voltage for load conditions? Or does it also require the service voltage to stay within Range B during power export conditions?

Cheers, Wayne
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top