I would also, but, I have always felt like the breaker locks were a real NEC "cop out" for equipment which requires servicing or testing. If you were working on that equipment and lets say replacing the metal cover near open terminals, how may electricians are going to walk to the other end of the building and lock the breaker out. If there was a pull-out/switch there, you would be far more likely to turn it off. If the CODE is "safety", breaker locks should not have snuck in, IMHO (90E probably makes that a mute point now)
Augie you have a very good point. When dealing with the larger Insta-hots
40a.In most cases there simply isn't enough room for a fused or non-fused
disconnect. I do like the recept idea though. The way I look at it
I give the service guy a choice. I clearly label the access panel of the
Insta-hot with a P-Touch label that informs the service guy as to
the location of the panel,what floor,room,panel, circuit number,and
that it is equipped with a breaker lock-out device. If the service guy still
chooses to work it hot, that's his/her choice.