IS Barrier Requirements

Status
Not open for further replies.

kcca

Member
I have an application involving a Class 1 Div 2 Group C,D area. The primary PLC control system will be located in a non-hazardous control room in an enclosure. This enclosure will also contain the I/O modules. The I/O modules are AB Flex I/O and the supplier states that they are rated for Class 1 Div 2 locations. Although they have this rating, will IS Barriers be required to interface the Flex I/O modules with the field instruments that are located outside of the non-hazardous area and within the designated Class 1 Div 2 Group C, D area? Even though the I/O modules are rated for Class 1 Div 2, I believe that IS Barriers are still required.
 

petersonra

Senior Member
Location
Northern illinois
Occupation
engineer
I have an application involving a Class 1 Div 2 Group C,D area. The primary PLC control system will be located in a non-hazardous control room in an enclosure. This enclosure will also contain the I/O modules. The I/O modules are AB Flex I/O and the supplier states that they are rated for Class 1 Div 2 locations. Although they have this rating, will IS Barriers be required to interface the Flex I/O modules with the field instruments that are located outside of the non-hazardous area and within the designated Class 1 Div 2 Group C, D area? Even though the I/O modules are rated for Class 1 Div 2, I believe that IS Barriers are still required.

It depends entirely on what the field devices that are located in the C1D2 area are.

The I/O modules can be located in a C1D2 area based on their listing, but the device(s) they are wired to might not be.
 

don_resqcapt19

Moderator
Staff member
Location
Illinois
Occupation
retired electrician
I have never used an IS barrier for instruments in a Class I, Division 2 area. In general electronic instruments (that have no arcing contacts) are suitable for use in Class I, Div 2 areas without IS barriers or seals. Equipment with arcing contacts need explosion proof enclosures and seals or barriers.
What are the field devices that are to be installed?
 

kcca

Member
I have never used an IS barrier for instruments in a Class I, Division 2 area. In general electronic instruments (that have no arcing contacts) are suitable for use in Class I, Div 2 areas without IS barriers or seals. Equipment with arcing contacts need explosion proof enclosures and seals or barriers.
What are the field devices that are to be installed?

Thanks to both of you for the quick reply. Regarding the location of the I/O modules, they will reside in a non-hazardous area within the central control room. Field wiring to the transmitters will be home runs to the central control room where the I/O modules are located.

The instruments are nothing special. They are basically 4-20 ma type analog inputs (i.e. PT's, FT's, LT's, etc.). These instruments will be located in the C1D2 area, and the twisted pair from each instrument will be home run back to the control room.
 
Thanks to both of you for the quick reply. Regarding the location of the I/O modules, they will reside in a non-hazardous area within the central control room. Field wiring to the transmitters will be home runs to the central control room where the I/O modules are located.

The instruments are nothing special. They are basically 4-20 ma type analog inputs (i.e. PT's, FT's, LT's, etc.). These instruments will be located in the C1D2 area, and the twisted pair from each instrument will be home run back to the control room.

In Div. 2 IS would be an overkill. I suggest that you investigate if your circuits meet the qualifications of a non-incendive circuit. To simplify it, non-incendive differs from IS mainly in the fault tolerance requirements, but is still concerns itself with the energy storing capability of the installed circuits. As long as your circuit produce neither excessive heat, or arcs - with sufficient energy to be the source of ignition - under normal operating conditions you may deem those circuits to be safe.
 

Smart $

Esteemed Member
Location
Ohio
... Although they have this rating, will IS Barriers be required to interface the Flex I/O modules with the field instruments that are located outside of the non-hazardous area and within the designated Class 1 Div 2 Group C, D area? Even though the I/O modules are rated for Class 1 Div 2, I believe that IS Barriers are still required.
IIRC, it is at least in part dependent on the chosen wiring method. Running your signal conductors/cable(s) in a C1D2-compliant conduit system does not require IS barriers. If you want to run open wiring (cables), you must use IS barriers. Some equipment must be certified for use in an IS system. Some may not need certified (e.g. thermocouples).

Click the link that follows for some more info:

http://www.omega.com/techref/intrinsic.html
 

Smart $

Esteemed Member
Location
Ohio
In Div. 2 IS would be an overkill. I suggest that you investigate if your circuits meet the qualifications of a non-incendive circuit. To simplify it, non-incendive differs from IS mainly in the fault tolerance requirements, but is still concerns itself with the energy storing capability of the installed circuits. As long as your circuit produce neither excessive heat, or arcs - with sufficient energy to be the source of ignition - under normal operating conditions you may deem those circuits to be safe.
I knew there was something else I was forgetting.
 
IIRC, it is at least in part dependent on the chosen wiring method. Running your signal conductors/cable(s) in a C1D2-compliant conduit system does not require IS barriers. If you want to run open wiring (cables), you must use IS barriers. Some equipment must be certified for use in an IS system. Some may not need certified (e.g. thermocouples).

Click the link that follows for some more info:

http://www.omega.com/techref/intrinsic.html

You can use cable tray or it's "Orphan Annie" derivative; wire basket in Div. 2 installation. I consider those 'open wiring'. Unsupported open wiring has further restrictions on the cable type and length of unsupported exposure, although the later is fairly ambigous for instrument circuits.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top