Is bonding a must for an old pool

Status
Not open for further replies.

croisdale

New member
I have a pool that was built 8 years ago. The motor is grounded but it is not bonded to the pool. I am selling the home and the home inspector is telling the new owners that I have to bond it before they can buy the home. The question is does this code apply in AZ to pools built prior to the code?
 
croisdale said:
I have a pool that was built 8 years ago. The motor is grounded but it is not bonded to the pool. I am selling the home and the home inspector is telling the new owners that I have to bond it before they can buy the home. The question is does this code apply in AZ to pools built prior to the code?


Probably won't matter if it stops the people from buying your home... Is it a real deal breaker for you to make it safe for the new owners?
 
croisdale said:
The question is does this code apply in AZ to pools built prior to the code?

I believe the NEC required bonding of the pump 8 years ago. In fact, I think it has been required for as long as I can remember.
 
I think your employer would be able to accuratly determine IF the NEC was in effect when the home was built...and also what YEAR would be the effective year.

Occupation:
Sales

How are you related to the electrical industry?
:
Sales for an electrican
 
croisdale said:
I have a pool that was built 8 years ago. The motor is grounded but it is not bonded to the pool................ The question is does this code apply in AZ to pools built prior to the code?

The code has required bonding the motor to the pool for a lot more years than 8.

You may not have to do anything but at the same time the prospective buyers can move on to another home.
 
croisdale said:
I have a pool that was built 8 years ago. The motor is grounded but it is not bonded to the pool. I am selling the home and the home inspector is telling the new owners that I have to bond it before they can buy the home.

He's wrong. He's pointing out an issue he thinks the prospective homebuyer would want to know. It's their choice to accept the home as-is, or ask you to correct it before a deal is made, or find some middle ground.

The question is does this code apply in AZ to pools built prior to the code?

Most likely, yes. But there's no law against selling a home with known defects.
 
LawnGuyLandSparky said:
But there's no law against selling a home with known defects.

Be careful there as there are some areas that will not allow a home to change hands with known code violations.

As an example here in MA GFCIs must be present in the bathroom before the home can change hands.
 
iwire said:
Be careful there as there are some areas that will not allow a home to change hands with known code violations.

As an example here in MA GFCIs must be present in the bathroom before the home can change hands.

We have very similar laws here (GFI in bath, kitchen, outside, etc), but the property CAN change hands. A CCO is not issued, but rather a TCO ~ with a time limit in which these repairs must be made.


I am actually curious as to how the pool was even installed w/o an inspection???
A pool is not a one-day slam-jam-and scram job.
 
celtic said:
We have very similar laws here (GFI in bath, kitchen, outside, etc), but the property CAN change hands. A CCO is not issued, but rather a TCO ~ with a time limit in which these repairs must be made.


Not all of New Jersey's 650+ towns and cities require any CO's when the house is sold. Some do, some don't. For the one's that don't, state "as-is" in the contract and the buyer gets what he gets. Caveat emptor.:rolleyes:
 
celtic said:
I don't.

A pool w/o bonding screams "no inspection".

Possibly, but very few inground pools go in under the radar. I'd say it's more likely the pump HAD a bond connection, and it got "lost" or buried after the 1st winter storage cycle.
 
croisdale said:
I have a pool that was built 8 years ago. The motor is grounded but it is not bonded to the pool......

Is this a permanently installed pool??? If not, no bonding required. In the O.P. it does not say what it is or if it is in fact "in" the ground . The use of the word "built" leads me to think that it is a permanently installed pool, in which case the building department could take action ,..if it sees this as an unacceptable threat to life.
 
Pools going in under the radar are a big problem where I'm at. I would guess that about 50% of the existing pools I see have no bonding, so I deduce that there was no permit or inspection. Now as far as our local inspectors letting a pool go without bonding when there is a permit, forget it, those guys are all serious business when it comes to pools.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top