Is it a Backfed Breaker or a Supply Side Tap?

Status
Not open for further replies.

SunFish

NABCEP Certified
Location
ID
Occupation
Sr. PV Systems Design Engineer
Working on a 45 kW PV system with residential 120/240 AC backfeed. The customer has a Square D 600 A I-line MDP that is LUG FED from the meter and there are currently 5 breakers being used as 5 main service disconnects in this panel (below the six switch rule). There is currently one available breaker slot not being used. Total output from all of my inverters combined requires a 225 A breaker. I have confirmed with Schneider/Square D that the max breaker size they allow in any of the two pole breaker slots in their I-line panels is 225 A when the service voltage is at or below 240 V. Currently there are three 200 A breakers and two 150 A breakers each feeding different loads panels. (Its a very large house!)

My question is if I were to put a 225 A breaker onto this panel is this considered a backfed breaker that must conform to the 120% rule or is this a supply-side connection? I am thinking this is technically a supply-side connection since there is no main breaker and the busbar is technically part of the main service conductors feeding the 5 main service breakers. Therefore the 120% rule shouldn't apply, right? I really don't see any difference electrically speaking if we connect with the 225 A breaker at the busbar vs. doing a supply side connection on the service conductors outside. Either way this busbar is still fed with both the utility power and solar power to the main lugs.

705.12(A) says that we can do a supply side connection as long as we don't exceed the rating of the service, which we're well under with 225 A of backfeed on a 600 A service. For 705.12(D)(2)(1 & 2) I'm not making any connections to feeders since all the main service disconnects are technically after the point of my backfeed, so that section doesn't apply. And for 705.12(D)(2)(3) since there is no main overcurrent device protection the busbar portion of the service conductors in the MDP the 120% calculation shouldn't apply.

From what I'm seeing this is a supply side connection and I should be all on the up and up with code to make a connection in this MDP with a 225 A breaker but I'm curious what you all think. Am I good to do a breaker in this MDP for my solar backfeed or are there some additional rules I'm violating that I'm not aware of?

Side question, if I do install the 225 A breaker should this be located at the opposite end of the MDP busbar from the main lug connection or does it even matter? Also, technically this breaker would not count as one of 6 service disconnect since you can still disconnect all of the loads panels with the 5 service breakers in the MDP, right?
 

GoldDigger

Moderator
Staff member
Location
Placerville, CA, USA
Occupation
Retired PV System Designer
This would indeed be a supply side connection and the NEC allows it regardless of panel position.
But not all POCOs or AHJs allow supply side PV feeds and some have unique restrictions on them.
YMMdefinitelyV.
Although the NEC says that such a disconnect need not be service rated it is arguable whether or not it counts as a disconnect handle. You are still safe with six though.

Sent from my XT1585 using Tapatalk
 

ggunn

PE (Electrical), NABCEP certified
Location
Austin, TX, USA
Occupation
Electrical Engineer - Photovoltaic Systems
Working on a 45 kW PV system with residential 120/240 AC backfeed. The customer has a Square D 600 A I-line MDP that is LUG FED from the meter and there are currently 5 breakers being used as 5 main service disconnects in this panel (below the six switch rule). There is currently one available breaker slot not being used. Total output from all of my inverters combined requires a 225 A breaker. I have confirmed with Schneider/Square D that the max breaker size they allow in any of the two pole breaker slots in their I-line panels is 225 A when the service voltage is at or below 240 V. Currently there are three 200 A breakers and two 150 A breakers each feeding different loads panels. (Its a very large house!)

My question is if I were to put a 225 A breaker onto this panel is this considered a backfed breaker that must conform to the 120% rule or is this a supply-side connection? I am thinking this is technically a supply-side connection since there is no main breaker and the busbar is technically part of the main service conductors feeding the 5 main service breakers. Therefore the 120% rule shouldn't apply, right? I really don't see any difference electrically speaking if we connect with the 225 A breaker at the busbar vs. doing a supply side connection on the service conductors outside. Either way this busbar is still fed with both the utility power and solar power to the main lugs.

705.12(A) says that we can do a supply side connection as long as we don't exceed the rating of the service, which we're well under with 225 A of backfeed on a 600 A service. For 705.12(D)(2)(1 & 2) I'm not making any connections to feeders since all the main service disconnects are technically after the point of my backfeed, so that section doesn't apply. And for 705.12(D)(2)(3) since there is no main overcurrent device protection the busbar portion of the service conductors in the MDP the 120% calculation shouldn't apply.

From what I'm seeing this is a supply side connection and I should be all on the up and up with code to make a connection in this MDP with a 225 A breaker but I'm curious what you all think. Am I good to do a breaker in this MDP for my solar backfeed or are there some additional rules I'm violating that I'm not aware of?

Side question, if I do install the 225 A breaker should this be located at the opposite end of the MDP busbar from the main lug connection or does it even matter? Also, technically this breaker would not count as one of 6 service disconnect since you can still disconnect all of the loads panels with the 5 service breakers in the MDP, right?

In addition to what GoldiLocks ( :D ) said, you really need to go over this design with your AHJ. Some AHJ's will not let you land a backfed PV breaker in an MLO MDP no matter what the size or handle count is. For example, here in Austin when I encountered a very similar situation, they directed me to mount a bladed fused disco on the wall and tap the busbars of the MLO MDP with conductors less than 10' long.

Alternatively, I could have installed a main breaker in the MDP and landed the PV on what would then be a load side connection with a breaker, but as in your case I couldn't have done that without busting the 120% rule or taking a chance on starving the building power, depending on the size of the main breaker.
 
Last edited:

jaggedben

Senior Member
Location
Northern California
Occupation
Solar and Energy Storage Installer
Sunfish, a suggestion: ask yourself "Is this a load side connection or a supply side connection?" and the question nearly answers itself. If there is no other disconnecting means electrically in between the utility and the connection then it is a supply side connection. That's what the code primarily cares about. Whether it's a breaker or a fused disconnect and whether it's 'backfed' is beside the question.
 

ggunn

PE (Electrical), NABCEP certified
Location
Austin, TX, USA
Occupation
Electrical Engineer - Photovoltaic Systems
Sunfish, a suggestion: ask yourself "Is this a load side connection or a supply side connection?" and the question nearly answers itself. If there is no other disconnecting means electrically in between the utility and the connection then it is a supply side connection. That's what the code primarily cares about. Whether it's a breaker or a fused disconnect and whether it's 'backfed' is beside the question.
I realize that I am splitting a hair since OCPD and disconnecting means are usually one and the same, but the issue is whether or not the tapped conductor or busbar is or is not protected by an OCPD.
 

jaggedben

Senior Member
Location
Northern California
Occupation
Solar and Energy Storage Installer
I realize that I am splitting a hair since OCPD and disconnecting means are usually one and the same, but the issue is whether or not the tapped conductor or busbar is or is not protected by an OCPD.

Actually, the NEC refers to the disconnecting means, not the OCPD.
 

Smart $

Esteemed Member
Location
Ohio
Actually, the NEC refers to the disconnecting means, not the OCPD.
And that is why the following was added to the 2014 Code:

705.31 Location of Overcurrent Protection. Overcurrent
protection for electric power production source conductors,
connected to the supply side of the service disconnecting
means in accordance with 705.12(A), shall be located
within 3m (10 ft) of the point where the electric power
production source conductors are connected to the service.

Informational Note: This overcurrent protection protects​
against short-circuit current supplied from the primary​
source(s) of electricity.​

Exception: Where the overcurrent protection for the power
production source is located more than 3 m (10 ft) from the
point of connection for the electric power production
source to the service, cable limiters or current-limited circuit
breakers for each ungrounded conductor shall be installed
at the point where the electric power production
conductors are connected to the service.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top