Re: Is NEC a set of LAWS ?
jim: without debating the common sense necessity of making copies available at low cost, or free to view (and pay to copy), there are a few problems with your 11 points.
the "monopoly is illegal" is the point of this response. Where is it given that monopolies are illegal. Pocos are defacto monopolies. they are not illegal. Another: a friend moved to AZ to retire doing home inspections. Arizona gave a monopolistic blanket authority to govern home inspections to one company. ONE company. to qualify for that company you have to do like 200 free inspections, or near free (something like $5 an hour for a year). monopolies are common.
this issue cannot be addressed by over simplified statements.
holding a copyright is not a monopoly.
paul
jim: without debating the common sense necessity of making copies available at low cost, or free to view (and pay to copy), there are a few problems with your 11 points.
the "monopoly is illegal" is the point of this response. Where is it given that monopolies are illegal. Pocos are defacto monopolies. they are not illegal. Another: a friend moved to AZ to retire doing home inspections. Arizona gave a monopolistic blanket authority to govern home inspections to one company. ONE company. to qualify for that company you have to do like 200 free inspections, or near free (something like $5 an hour for a year). monopolies are common.
this issue cannot be addressed by over simplified statements.
holding a copyright is not a monopoly.
paul
