Is this "bundling"

Status
Not open for further replies.
I see only one definition in the NEC, and that don't fit...

Bundled. Cables or conductors that are tied, wrapped,
taped, or otherwise periodically bound together.
 
IMO, that pushes the limit to what could be considered bundling. I would not do an install like that.

I agree that it is pushing the limit, and I'm interested in what one of the inspectors in the forum think, The whole AHJ thing...;)
 
Put same conductors in a big raceway and it is bundling though.

How do you know those wires were not snaked from point "A" to "B" I don't see an issue at all with that install. its called a real work environment.

Maybe I should change what I said for clarification purposes- If you put same cables in a raceway they may not be "bundled" but still require deration for number of cables in a raceway just like they also would if they were bound together. Now picture the chase they are pulled through to be just as effective at retaining heat as a similar sized raceway or wireway.
 
because they are not tie wrapped or in a pipe, no, it's not "bundled" just crappy workmanship. people need to learn about "stack its", and what a difference they can make on the cleanliness of an electrical house rough in. i push 'em here, cause i see this all the time. messy is all









there ain't many problem that a man can't fix, with $700.00 and a 30.06
 
because they are not tie wrapped or in a pipe, no, it's not "bundled" just crappy workmanship. people need to learn about "stack its", and what a difference they can make on the cleanliness of an electrical house rough in. i push 'em here, cause i see this all the time. messy is all








there ain't many problem that a man can't fix, with $700.00 and a 30.06

And if they were fished through that space? Sure looks like that is a good possibility.
 
I see only one definition in the NEC, and that don't fit...

Bundled. Cables or conductors that are tied, wrapped,
taped, or otherwise periodically bound together.

And that makes no sense-- If I tie wrap 10 cables together every 4 feet and they are spread out in between then IMO that is not bundling. In this image I see many wires laying atop of another and I see it as bundling. The fact is what an inspector says here has no bearing on what one states somewhere else. It is a judgement call. I would rather err on the side where it can't be questioned. Spread them out a bit and no issues at all.
 
And that makes no sense-- If I tie wrap 10 cables together every 4 feet and they are spread out in between then IMO that is not bundling. In this image I see many wires laying atop of another and I see it as bundling. The fact is what an inspector says here has no bearing on what one states somewhere else. It is a judgement call. I would rather err on the side where it can't be questioned. Spread them out a bit and no issues at all.

Hold on there captain. I didn't try to ruffle feathers with the post, I was interested in an inspectors point of view along with the others that have posted. In your earlier post you said it pushes the limit of bundling. I took that to mean you didn't think it was bundling.
I merely stated that I agreed that it wasn't bundling per the definition, and that I agreed with you that it pushes the limit.
 
Hold on there captain. I didn't try to ruffle feathers with the post,
I didn't take it that way. I was stating that the definition for bundling is not very good because when you tie wrap every "X" feet it means nothing unless the cables are left in a bundle. The code does not give us a clear answer as to what bundling is and we have no idea what the distance required would be to space the conductors.

I was interested in an inspectors point of view along with the others that have posted.
I was just pointing out that in the end your AHJ will make the decision and what we say here will make no difference. It is good to know what others think but this will be an interpretation.
In your earlier post you said it pushes the limit of bundling. I took that to mean you didn't think it was bundling.
. Well it can go either way. IMO it is bundling

I merely stated that I agreed that it wasn't bundling per the definition, and that I agreed with you that it pushes the limit.
I was not attacking you.
 
I didn't take it that way. I was stating that the definition for bundling is not very good because when you tie wrap every "X" feet it means nothing unless the cables are left in a bundle. The code does not give us a clear answer as to what bundling is and we have no idea what the distance required would be to space the conductors.


I was not attacking you.

Fair enough. Doesn't the definition of bundling in the code cover it adequately?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top