Situation: We are installing a data center. The equipment is a single system consisting of a couple cabinets of UPS and 14 equipment racks. Type SO interconnect cables between adjacent cabinets are run in troughs above the equipment that are part of each cabinet. Where necessary to cross aisles, cables are supported by overhead ladder rack. All equipment is provided by a single vendor, installed in accordance with the vendor's requirements, and listed under a single UL file per UL Std 60950 for IT equipment. The listing includes the UPS, cabinets, interconnect cables, and ladder racks.
The room meets all but one of the requirements of NEC Article 645 for IT environments, therefore fails to be Article 645-compliant.
The inspector claims that because the room is not Article 645-compliant, the equipment no longer qualifies under the exemptions allowed by 645. He has tagged the system because the interconnect cable are now considered premises wiring, and the NEC prohibits use of SO cord for permanent installations. He has demanded that all the interconnect cables be removed and replaced with either Type MC or TC cable or be run in conduit.
The vendor claims that the listing is for the equipment, not for the room. Per Article 90.7, "The factory-installed internal wiring or the construction of equipjment need not be inpected at the time of installation of the equipment, except to detect alterations or damage, if the equipment has been listed by a qualified electrical testing laboratory."
Question: I have searched through NFPA 70 and NFPA 75, and I can not find where it states that the UL listing for IT equipment is VOID if it is not installed in a room that complies with Article 645. Who is right?
The room meets all but one of the requirements of NEC Article 645 for IT environments, therefore fails to be Article 645-compliant.
The inspector claims that because the room is not Article 645-compliant, the equipment no longer qualifies under the exemptions allowed by 645. He has tagged the system because the interconnect cable are now considered premises wiring, and the NEC prohibits use of SO cord for permanent installations. He has demanded that all the interconnect cables be removed and replaced with either Type MC or TC cable or be run in conduit.
The vendor claims that the listing is for the equipment, not for the room. Per Article 90.7, "The factory-installed internal wiring or the construction of equipjment need not be inpected at the time of installation of the equipment, except to detect alterations or damage, if the equipment has been listed by a qualified electrical testing laboratory."
Question: I have searched through NFPA 70 and NFPA 75, and I can not find where it states that the UL listing for IT equipment is VOID if it is not installed in a room that complies with Article 645. Who is right?