Jbox location

Status
Not open for further replies.

Sierrasparky

Senior Member
Location
USA
Occupation
Electrician ,contractor
If it is just a J-box it only needs to be "accessible" That is without removing other attached components.
 

jaggedben

Senior Member
Location
Northern California
Occupation
Solar and Energy Storage Installer
I've been hit with this occasionally. It's rather open to interpretation but the code does require boxes to be accessible. If the box can be opened without removing the module you are in better shape.
 

Sierrasparky

Senior Member
Location
USA
Occupation
Electrician ,contractor
690.34 Access to Boxes. Junction, pull, and outlet boxes
located behind modules or panels shall be so installed that
the wiring contained in them can be rendered accessible
directly or by displacement of a module(s) or panel(s)
secured by removable fasteners and connected by a
flexible wiring system.
 
690.34 Access to Boxes. Junction, pull, and outlet boxes
located behind modules or panels shall be so installed that
the wiring contained in them can be rendered accessible
directly or by displacement of a module(s) or panel(s)
secured by removable fasteners and connected by a
flexible wiring system.

Thank you! So it seems clear that it's fine for the jbox to be located under the array as long as you can remove a single panel to access correct?
 

Sierrasparky

Senior Member
Location
USA
Occupation
Electrician ,contractor
You are welcome!


That is what the code says, now you have the hard task to let the inspector know he is wrong.
 

pv_n00b

Senior Member
Location
CA, USA
We have an inspector saying that the jbox cannot be under one of the modules because it is not 'easily accessible'.

Can anybody chime in on code? We've never been called out on this before??


Also, 'easily accessible' is not a term defined in the NEC. There is accessible and readily accessible. The AHJ may like something to be easily accessible for O&M work but that's not a code requirement.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top