Sounds like a modern design which is correct because IG systems are a thing of the past. You may still see them with point of sale equipment but in reality IG systems are obsolete.I'm sorry for the terminology that I was used, my point is we've a school project with 30 kva step down 480V-120/208V k rating transformer in every electrical room, but the panel they fed no use isolated EGC in any branch circuits, is this design correct?
There is never a requirement for IG, except as a consequence of a design decision to use them. IMO, such a decision is generally not a very good decision, although it can eb a lucrative one for the people doing the work.I'm sorry for the terminology that I was used, my point is we've a school project with 30 kva step down 480V-120/208V k rating transformer in every electrical room, but the panel they fed no use isolated EGC in any branch circuits, is this design correct?
The use of a K rated transformer is strictly a design issue...not a safety or code issue. The code requirements for a K rated transformer installation are the same as for any standard transformer installation.I got some confused about why the NEC don't have any information about the characteristic of K rating transformer, I was looking but I couldn't find any information
Yes with a K-13 you would typcially use a 200% neutral but it's not a written in stone rule just a design option.that's should be sizing the neutral secondary up to 200% of the load connected between any ungrounded conductor and the grounded conductor, is that correct?
For a typical mixed linear / non-linear load install, many designers try to reduce the neutral (<100%). When harmonics are expected, a K rated transformer gets specified and a full sized neutral gets used.that's should be sizing the neutral secondary up to 200% of the load connected between any ungrounded conductor and the grounded conductor, is that correct?