Going 680.22 C 4 and 680. 23
it would seem that 12v fixtures are acceptable within five feet
if a barrier transformer is used.
And the submerged well lights for the lilly pond are ok right next to the pool
as they are listed for pool use.
Of course GFCI is already understood.
Does anybody else concur?
Shep,
I like 680.22 C 4 and 680. 23.
This is an application where due caution necessary,
which you show by checking the code specs.
Thank you.
These are steps in the right direction.
However, technically,
I wonder if a GFCI would trip if the leakage occured
on the secondary of the LV transformer.
The Transformer is a self-referenced system,
and my first thought is that the GFCI would not see the leakage.
I think that the GFCI would only see a load,
and the hot/neutral currents on the monitored primary side would balance.
I have done experiments (with physiological monitoring equipment)
and found that human skin conduction can be as low at 1 KOhm.
If penetration occurs, then the resistance drops further,
and feeds around through the arterial system,
possibly through the heart, where fibrillation can occur.
Conclusion,
Even if the LV fixtures are fed from a transformer,
which is a self-referenced system,
the possibility remains for a problem.