Re: Laundromat service calc's
The NEC defines a ?Continuous Load? as ?A load where the maximum current is expected to continue for 3 hours or more.? I don?t believe that that definition could be used to force a commercial laundry to apply the 125% factor to the dryer load. Nevertheless, as a design engineer, I would apply the 125% factor. I am certain that I could convince the owner that the benefits would outweigh the slight additional cost. I have two reasons; both are related to design considerations, not to code issues.
First, this is a kind business that cannot afford interruptions in service. If a circuit breaker trips, whatever the cause, you will have unhappy customers. Not only will there be a delay, while the breaker is located and reset, but the customers will also have to put in more coins, since a loss of power could cause the timers to reset. This will cost the owner money, and its not worth the risk.
Secondly, whatever physics might be involved in the 125% factor, I believe that the short periods that a dryer is not running (e.g., until another coin is inserted or while the dryer is unloaded then reloaded) will not allow the electrical components (i.e., breakers, wires , and terminations) enough time to cool off. Over a full 8 ? 12 hour day, I believe that they will behave the same way they would behave if they were never turned off during the whole day.
Here again, code does not require using the 125% factor, but I would use it anyway.