LB;s

Status
Not open for further replies.

jflynn

Senior Member
Alot of us have used LB;s as a great way to transition a conduit run or even as a pull point.However I have found that using LB;s with feeder or service size conductors are not compliant,I think mostly for the cu.inch and bending radius.I have never really second guessed this fitting,figuring as long as I ordered the cooresponing size, than it should handle the conductors that are going in the conduit that has been sized accordingly.Lately we have been using a wireway/trough with a much better feel for the end result, along with an easier install.I just went over this with our estimation dept.so I hope I/am correct in my findings....
 
Yes sometimes we use an oversized lb with reducers to compensate when an lb is desired be careful as to trough size and you can orient your covers to help with pulling clearances.
 
LBs for conductors sized #4 and larger must 314.28(A)(2) or (3). Most standard size fittings do not comply. You cannot not just use a standard size conduit body of the same trade size as the conduit.
 
don_resqcapt19 said:
LBs for conductors sized #4 and larger must 314.28(A)(2) or (3). Most standard size fittings do not comply. You cannot not just use a standard size conduit body of the same trade size as the conduit.


This is what I thought,I think alot of us never consider it this way,thanks
 
If the LB does not comply with 314.28, the manufacturer must label the fitting with the maximum size and number of conductors that the fitting is capable of accomodating.
It's an old Chicago myth that service conductors require a fitting larger than what would be required for other conductors
 
Brian,
There is not a requirement for the manufacture to mark the fitting with the maximum size and number of conductors, however if he doesn't and you are installing conductors #4 and larger, then size of the fitting must comply with 314.28(A)(2) if it is an LB and 314.28(A)(1) if it is a C.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top