What are the benefits of using LFNC over LFMC besides some cost saving? Per code, both can be longer than 6 feet if support properly and has ground wire pulled.
In an application with a lot of vibration, I have seen the insulation on the conductors wear through and ground out on the inner metal of LFMC.
If it is in an area where there is a lot of activity, LFMC can get crushed and broken, but LFNC might bounce back.
But also in an area where there is a lot of activity, the plastic fittings for LFNC can breaker sooner than the metal fittings for LFMC.
When the end of LFMC gets ruined from getting stepped on, and the spiral metal is no longer interlocked or completely broken, the jacket split open and conductors showing, (see pic, a 90 degree fitting would have been a good choice here) It can often be repaired in place without pulling the conductors out. You can undo the fitting and carefully trim off the damaged portion and put everything back together.
In rare occasions where the best choice for bonding is the conduit itself, LFMC will work, but not LFNC.
In corrosive environments, LFMC fittings can corrode.
I prefer LFMC.