Coppersmith
Senior Member
- Location
- Tampa, FL, USA
- Occupation
- Electrical Contractor
A nearby existing client called me over to replace some fluorescent fixtures with some LED fixtures he bought. When I got there I quickly realized these LED fixtures were not listed by any agency and looked dangerous to install. (No j-box, 6" light gauge power lead come out from under fixture with no space or bushing so fixture smashed down on wire when fastened to ceiling.)
I asked him where he got them. "Amazon", he said. I explained that they were a safety hazard and I cannot install them. I suggested instead that I install some LED replacement tubes in his existing fixtures. I told him that I had installed these before and that they just required me to remove the ballast from the circuit so the job would be even less labor-wise even if the tubes were more expensive then his bargain on Amazon. He agreed and I said "no charge for today" even though I thought it would be fairer to me to charge for my trip and time. I thought charging would make him very unhappy. (Do you think I should have charged a minimum service charge?)
Later that day I went to Home Depot to pick up material and also look at the LED tubes. In addition to the one's I have installed before that require ballast removal, they have a new model called "plug and play". I works on both T12 and T8 ballasts. Just remove the old tubes and install these. Now I have a moral dilemma.
Do I buy the "plug and play", markup the product (double normally), swap tubes, and charge for a service call when the client could easily do this himself? (And it would be apparent.)
Do I buy and install the direct wire, ignore the other product, and charge my normal fee?
I'm tempted to just call him up and give him the SKU of the "plug and play" product and say do it yourself and save a bunch of money I would normally charge. I will lose money on this job but gain some good will. Not sure it makes sense to do so.
I asked him where he got them. "Amazon", he said. I explained that they were a safety hazard and I cannot install them. I suggested instead that I install some LED replacement tubes in his existing fixtures. I told him that I had installed these before and that they just required me to remove the ballast from the circuit so the job would be even less labor-wise even if the tubes were more expensive then his bargain on Amazon. He agreed and I said "no charge for today" even though I thought it would be fairer to me to charge for my trip and time. I thought charging would make him very unhappy. (Do you think I should have charged a minimum service charge?)
Later that day I went to Home Depot to pick up material and also look at the LED tubes. In addition to the one's I have installed before that require ballast removal, they have a new model called "plug and play". I works on both T12 and T8 ballasts. Just remove the old tubes and install these. Now I have a moral dilemma.
Do I buy the "plug and play", markup the product (double normally), swap tubes, and charge for a service call when the client could easily do this himself? (And it would be apparent.)
Do I buy and install the direct wire, ignore the other product, and charge my normal fee?
I'm tempted to just call him up and give him the SKU of the "plug and play" product and say do it yourself and save a bunch of money I would normally charge. I will lose money on this job but gain some good will. Not sure it makes sense to do so.