petersonra
Senior Member
- Location
- Northern illinois
- Occupation
- engineer
Anyone use these lugs? Price seems right. I got some samples and they look like a decent lug.
Anyone use these lugs? Price seems right. I got some samples and they look like a decent lug.
Are they UL486 listed? If not there is no way that I would buy them.
most are. it appears this is the internet sales outlet for IHI
What code section requires the use of "listed" terminations?It appears as if the answer to be that maybe they are UL486 listed. Where is this acceptable in the NEC?
It may be that this question is to be avoided out of a fear of knowing what the answer is. What inspector anyway would inspect terminals for their listing. Out of sight out of mind.
Ul486 requires that a terminal be tested for temperature rise, pull tests, etc when used with listed wire when torqued to specification. Is it acceptable to the NEC to use Non-UL terminals?
tmpldi
I didnt see it that way - as far as appearing that some are UL listed - "most are" could mean -other than - the Lugs we are talking about.
and all the lug testing is usless unless the install is correct anyway right - maybe order some and see.
I know the 1st thing I did was look for the UL - Yup its there.. No Fear.
What code section requires the use of "listed" terminations?
In general, the NEC does not require the use of listed products. I don't see where the code requires the use of of listed components when field assembling a control panel.May it be like installing a non UL components such as a relays in a field assembled control panel?
May it be covered in 110.3 (B), 110.8, and 110.14 and (A)?
UL486 has very specific testing that must be completed before a lug can be listed. I discovered the importance of these series of test while following the rabbet trail of a simple lug as supplied on a breaker an OEMs of mine using hypalon wire locomotive/welders type wire. The is actually very little if any documentation regarding the type of wire which is allowed to be terminated in a lug. My research lead me to UL486 and the importance of class B and C standing, temperature rise and pull tests for a given terminal and a set of wire sizes.
After reviewing these test procedures I would be very reluctant to apply lugs that did not have a UL486 listing. In my tenure in the industry I have seen many lug failures including those where my OEMs had been using hypalon wire.
I didn't say that. I said that the code does not require that the lugs be listed. The listing lets you know that at least a sampling of the lugs have been tested by testing lab and that they meet the requirements of the standard. While non-listed lugs may have been manufactured to meet the meet the standard you do not have independent verification of that.Then we should'nt be concerned if the Lug is UL - or is UL stamped then correct..
I don't think that the standard that a product has been tested to is normally marked on the product.I looked on the self - we have a bunch, all - UL - none of them say UL486 Listed, I know the Lugs we have were not tested by UL but are mfg accordingly to meet the standard, I know the Lugs we purchased at Lugs Direct have the Stamp as well - Everythings fine.. I think a valid point was made to match the Lug to the wire.
I can see what you are saying Don. It may be that I know too much about the importance of using UL listed components and have assumed that the NEC has required that components be tested by a nationally recognized testing agency. I am aware if the importance of UL486 testing but it appears as though the NEC would allow knockoffs that circumvent the cost of such testing. Unless the manufacturer has documentation that confirms that their terminals meet UL testing requirements I would use caution in using a terminal simply because a fraudulent UL label can be stamped on the terminal. It appears as though the terminal in question in this series of post are UL listed making it a mute point.In general, the NEC does not require the use of listed products. I don't see where the code requires the use of of listed components when field assembling a control panel.
It does require that some things be listed, for example light fixtures and raceways and their fittings. 110.3(B) does not require the use of listed products, but does require compliance with the listing and labeling instructions if you use a listed product. I don't see how 110.8 requires the use of a listed product. I see nothing in 110.14 that requires the use of listed terminations.
That being said, some AHJs use 110.2 to require the use of listed products.
I also understand why someone would want to use a listed product over one that is not listed, but I just don't see anything in the code that directly requires the use of listed terminations.
I can see what you are saying Don. It may be that I know too much about the importance of using UL listed components and have assumed that the NEC has required that components be tested by a nationally recognized testing agency. I am aware if the importance of UL486 testing but it appears as though the NEC would allow knockoffs that circumvent the cost of such testing. Unless the manufacturer has documentation that confirms that their terminals meet UL testing requirements I would use caution in using a terminal simply because a fraudulent UL label can be stamped on the terminal. It appears as though the terminal in question in this series of post are UL listed making it a mute point.
It's good to add another terminal manufacture as they will provide more completion.
I didn't say that. I said that the code does not require that the lugs be listed. The listing lets you know that at least a sampling of the lugs have been tested by testing lab and that they meet the requirements of the standard. While non-listed lugs may have been manufactured to meet the meet the standard you do not have independent verification of that.
I don't think that the standard that a product has been tested to is normally marked on the product.
some are only recognized, if you look closely, especially the neutral bars.
I want UL listed to 486 so I can use them in a UL508a control panel.
Are there terminals that are UL recognized?
Are they being used as part of a listed panel such as 508?Just received my 2nd order today. They seem to be good product.
I use the mechanical butt splices and am happy with them.
Between Lugs Direct and HD, I am saving about $3.5 per splice if I purchase through lugs direct.
UL recognized intended to be installed at the factory and not in the field.terminals are only recognized, not listed.
connectors can be listed or recognized.