Mad Cows

Status
Not open for further replies.

bennie

Esteemed Member
I have been reading that the State of Wisconsin has ruled in favor of the cows over the old stray voltage phenomenon.

I would like to see Charlie's take on this subject.
 

tom baker

First Chief Moderator
Staff member
Re: Mad Cows

last fall I had a conversation about stray voltage with a wisconsin utility engineer. Its a very big problem, often the utility will have a contractor reqire a barn to solve the stray voltage issue, as farm wiring is frequently not to code.
 

bennie

Esteemed Member
Re: Mad Cows

Tom: The article is in the latest edition of the EC&M Magazine. The State Supreme Court ruled in the favor of the dairy owner, and against the power company.

I would like to read the trial transcript.
 

bennie

Esteemed Member
Re: Mad Cows

Russell: Don't mention that :( ...Soares grounding book says there is no electrical connection between the primary and secondary of a transformer. That is why it is a separately derived system.

A real separately derived system will prevent earth current flow. This is why the utility neutral must be disconnected from the premises wiring.
 

bennie

Esteemed Member
Re: Mad Cows

Russell: The utility companies call the system of electrically connecting the primary to the secondary a MGN system.

The NEC experts call this a separately derived system. Go figure :D
 

bennie

Esteemed Member
Re: Mad Cows

That is correct. The meaning is electrically separated from the other power supply.

The opposite of...Electrically connected, means to be capable of carrying current as opposed to magnetic coupling.
 

hornetd

Senior Member
Location
Maryland
Occupation
Journeyman Electrician, Retired
Re: Mad Cows

So What is the upshot of the circuit courts reconsideration of the nature of the injunctive relief that it ordered? Did WEPCO have to provide an overhead ungrounded delta system or didn't it? This is not idle curiosity here. I am much more interested in what works then in who won. I tried and failed to get an ungrounded secondary transformer installed to supply a client dairy farmer. I ended up moving the electrical service point to the property line to make the grounding of the neutral as remote as possible from the dairy buildings. I ran an overhead four wire single phase feeder system to all buildings on the farm and I put main bonding jumper current detection at the service. The detection will sound an alarm if any measurable current flow occurs thus allowing the rancher to switch to a power take off generator that is a true separately derived system. When we did this the last time that they had problems the erratic dairy heard behavior stopped.
--
Tom

[ July 12, 2003, 03:40 PM: Message edited by: hornetd ]
 

bennie

Esteemed Member
Re: Mad Cows

Tom: The utility company will not supply a delta ungrounded secondary except for special purposes. The special purpose is when a winding to winding fault, in the transformer, will not be a hazard.

With the MGN system, fault, and load current, from a downwind service can appear on the dairy service even when off.
 

hornetd

Senior Member
Location
Maryland
Occupation
Journeyman Electrician, Retired
Re: Mad Cows

Bennie
I did a google search and read ten differrent articles on dairy farm stray voltage.
Several articles mention isolation transformers. I can't figure out a code compliant way to install an isolation transformer. If I do figure out a code compliant way to install them so that they will pass inspection based on the US NEC then I can make some serious money installing them. One farmer went to on farm generation and his increased production more than paid for the cost of running the generator.
--
Tom
 

bennie

Esteemed Member
Re: Mad Cows

Tom: I would like to buy stock in your company. I like milk :cool:

Look in the 1984 edition of the handbook, if you have one. The drawing of a separately derived system is shown as one with an ungrounded primary supply. There was no electrical connection between the primary and secondary.

Someone came along after McPartland and drew in the equipment grounding on his drawings. This caused the definition of a separately derived system to go sideways.

This is why I say there is no such thing as a transformer source for a separately derived system. I have all the technical and engineering documents to substantiate my stand on this issue.

This misinterpretation should be corrected.

A separately derived system is a premises wiring system supplied with an ungrounded primary and a grounded secondary transformer source.

An isolation transformer is one with a grounded primary and an ungrounded secondary.
 

bennie

Esteemed Member
Re: Mad Cows

An ungrounded 480 system is supplied by a grounded 480 secondary to the primary of the end user transformer.

The transformer is a delta/delta 480/480 This is due to the possibility of an arc through from primary to secondary. The fault will not open the cut outs until it becomes a LL fault, but will show on the ground detector alarm or lights, plus you can trace the smoke.

[ July 12, 2003, 11:10 PM: Message edited by: bennie ]
 

charlie

Senior Member
Location
Indianapolis
Re: Mad Cows

Originally posted by Bennie:
I would like to see Charlie's take on this subject.
I'm back. :D With my hard drive crash and the power outages from the storms that went through, I have not been able to be involved. With all that said, I will not comment on any subject on stray voltage in writing while I am still working. I will be happy to give my opinions verbally if I am at an IAEI meeting or something like that. Sorry, Charlie ;)
 

bennie

Esteemed Member
Re: Mad Cows

Charlie: I was beginning to think you crashed.

I recently upgraded my computer. I am learning how to edit and produce movies from a DV Camera.
They require a lot of disc space.

I now have 112 GB hard drive space and 640 MB RAM.

I can understand your reluctance to print any thing about a subject that could have legal repercussions, considering your position.

I lost my job, as an inspector, by expressing my concern about EMF and energy fields, over a children's playground, due to high voltage transmission lines. The local TV station made me famous for 2 minutes :eek:

Good to see you are OK. Your knowledge of both inside and outside work is valuable to this forum, and to the NEC.
 

karl riley

Senior Member
Re: Mad Cows

Bennie, I would like to hear more about this (losing job because of opinions about EMF over child playground). When I was in California I was called in to measure fields from just such a situation in Marin County. PG&E was cooperative at that time, the press was on the side of the school, and so PG&E raised and reconfigured the transmission line over the playground to bring the fields down to 1 mG. They also changed a spread-out service drop that looped over a classroom to triplex configuration, which reduced the field to insignificant.

I had other friendly interactions with PG&E as well as So Cal Edison and also got a reconfiguration (reverse phasing)of the phases on a transmission line impacting a software company.

Some other utilities were more into stonewalling. It depended partly on who you spoke to. But the propaganda war goes on and sometimes one side has the press with it and sometimes the other. At this time California law specifies a setback for schools from differnt power lines.

When were you involved?
Karl
 

karl riley

Senior Member
Re: Mad Cows

Tom, I think your solution of putting the SE point on the edge of the property and running 4-wire is the best solution I have heard of yet, and will recommend it in the future. Then the farmer just has to clean up his wiring and make sure he doesn't have neutral running around on metal stalls, etc.

Then as long as primary neutral is not coursing thru the farm because it has found a short cut back to the substation, the farm should be clear.
Karl
 

bennie

Esteemed Member
Re: Mad Cows

Karl: There is a utility easement corridor running from Washington State, through Oregon, into California.

This corridor has iron maiden towers for 230 KV lines, and wooden structures for 138 KV lines.

There is also, in the ground, a gasoline pipeline from California to Washington. This is the same line that killed two boys, in Washington, when the line leaked and gas spread in the stream where the boys were wading. The gas was ignited and the explosion killed the boys.

I call this setup "The corridor to Hell"

I went on record about a childrens play area being erected under the lines. The kids were actually getting a slight shock when touching the structure.

The builder/developer of a lot of high end homes bordering this corridor, protested to the community I was working. He was also the builder of the playground. The property owners and parents of the children had the playground moved to a greater distance, partly based on my statements.

This builder had a lot of political clout. I was a contract inspector, and my contract was not renewed. The reason given to me was that I was under bid for the position. I found out the replacement was charging ten dollars per hour more than I was.

I was informed by a credible source that the city officials were upset over my statement "I would not let my grandkids on that playground"

This statement appeared in the Oregonian newspaper and was on camera, with me saying it on TV.

[ July 13, 2003, 03:19 PM: Message edited by: bennie ]
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top