mbrooke
Batteries Included
- Location
- United States
- Occupation
- Technician
Your looking at K times ONAN vs K times ONAF I assume to fuse to your damage curve...
I believe normally ONAN is used. That’s what we use on our couple that’s left with fuses.
Will your transformer be ONAN most of the time (ours are 99% of the time)? If you forcing something right out of the gate you need a bigger XF.
We have one that sees above ONAN loading quite a bit. It’s being changed in 2020 for a larger unit.
Yes. The transformer rating is at ambient.
even our pole transformers will hold overload better in the winter than the summer...
if your forcing air or oil you just trying to keep a 40MVA coil cool during the overload.
And so is the magnetizing for that S&C plot, correct? Sorry for all the doubt :ashamed1:
And so is the magnetizing for that S&C plot, correct? Sorry for all the doubt :ashamed1:
With all the preeminence and the all- knowing omnipotence of Mr. Google, that should remove all your doubts.
The answers that you expect all come from the same source. It's just a matter of who is faster on the mouse click.
The miracle of the web. "Cut and paste" expertise is all you need.. . .it's a no-brainer.
At this stage of my journey--nothing amazes me anymore.
(Take note of my emoje--it's not an error.)
I don’t really agree with the cold load pickup inrush plots. I can see why the program plots them that way, but I don’t think it’s reality...
during an extended outage, there are more devices opened that the circuit reclosers or breakers at the station.
we energize the transformer first with nothing else closed.
we give the XF about two or three minutes and IF the line is clear to the first set of breakers we will energize the circuits one at a time, with some time in between.
From there loads normally have a chance to stabilize before additional lines are cleared and energized..
we also have a cold load pickup setting on the relays..
so tell me, why do you want to fuse a 40MVA XF? With a 751A at about $1200 with all kinds of protection and a 787 at $2200 for back up and additional 87 protection, why not spend the money, get a breaker and give your XF some real protection?
fuses are for assets you aren’t too overly concerned with... like pole transformers and wire...
not a 40MVA XF that is around 1.5 million...
I don’t really agree with the cold load pickup inrush plots. I can see why the program plots them that way, but I don’t think it’s reality...
during an extended outage, there are more devices opened that the circuit reclosers or breakers at the station.
we energize the transformer first with nothing else closed.
we give the XF about two or three minutes and IF the line is clear to the first set of breakers we will energize the circuits one at a time, with some time in between.
From there loads normally have a chance to stabilize before additional lines are cleared and energized..
we also have a cold load pickup setting on the relays..
so tell me, why do you want to fuse a 40MVA XF? With a 751A at about $1200 with all kinds of protection and a 787 at $2200 for back up and additional 87 protection, why not spend the money, get a breaker and give your XF some real protection?
fuses are for assets you aren’t too overly concerned with... like pole transformers and wire...
not a 40MVA XF that is around 1.5 million...
Mr. Google can be wrong. I never trust the net, and I doubt Google knows what S&C is thinking. An actual human, like that on Mike Holts is on orders of magnitude more reliable. :happyyes:
………………
Where do you think these websites store their data for user retrieval?
They hire website designers to create pages so users can find them thru search engines like GOOGLE.
And when you are looking for something (anything at all) Mr GOOGLE is there to find it for you. That’s why it’s called search engine.
Without this effort you won’t see their website pages.
My daughter is a website designer working for the Disney Corporation. She is familiar about how this system work.
Not necessarily that I know all of what she knows, but she does give me some useful ideas.
Website pages of companies are what make us able to read about their products. . . and this is how this web designers make money.
They are in there (website pages) for promoting their business,
If people don’t know anything about transformers or power distribution they won’t even bat an eye to open any of their published pages.
………..
Facts that are presented do not fall under fallacy classification. Only speculations and unproven hypotheses.
Factual information is verifiable.
Being verifiable cannot simply be considered veritable by representing it in pictures in this day and age.
It’s no longer following the old proverb that: “pictures are worth a thousand words.”
It only takes one fake picture to discredit every possible real pictures that would follow.
It’s more like: “once a jackass, always a jackass” (not an expletive, but refers to real sly animal).
No amount of redemption could undo this despicable reputation.
That’s why I hardly pay attention to those YOUTUBE videos. As I have said before: YOUTUBE is hazardous to your mental health.
Psychological studies show die-hard people who spend too much time on YOUTUBE become depressed. They lose the dichotomy between real and unreal. The cause of their depression.
..............
But as someone once said: with the internet smart people get smarter while dumb people get dumber. Not saying that about anyone here, just the human race as a whole.
................
Smart people are the ones who are capable of twisting the truth. . . dumb people remain dumb because they never had the faculties to determine real from fake.
I agree- but would you rather use Disney's site for information about their services rather than some random person on say reddit.
Verifiable with what and against what? Do you have any idea how many "expert" and "pro" websites exist to verify joe DIY's claim that ground rods protect people from shock? Long drawn out lecture that the earth is a sink and a few extra electrons are just adding drops of water to the ocean so the earth will never loose its negative charge potential?
Why should I trust some old senile guy from Florida who made a YouTube video with folding tables and dyed bed sheets in what looks like his basement patronizingly shouting "grounding is not bonding, bonding is not grounding"? I mean sure he has a businesses, but with an objective to sell his books which seem to go against common knowledge which is clearly proven wrong by a few mouse clicks on Google.
Of course, this is in no way taking a swipe at Mike, rather how his videos and books could be viewed and has come up on DIY sites years back.
I have to disagree. Not every YouTube video is made a trolls or conspiracy theorists. There are tons of legit people like engineering students sharing their knowledge with the world. And what better way to show a real time event like a glowing busbar then recording it?
Smart people with evil intentions yes- but just as tragic dumb people in positions of power. When authority says something parts of our brain that deal with logic and reasoning shut down. A doctor could say something absolutely untrue, but you would believe it solely based on his credentials. Not that a doctor would deliberately lie, and that applies to those posting here. Smart people on here with good intentions
Nothing in your protracted missive makes way for an intelligent discussion. It's no different from your puerile videos.
I have no qualms about instructional MH videos. They are instructional as the word goes, but your videos are just a waste of bandwidth.
No wonder forum members complain about traffic slow down.
You are hogging the speed.
And please don't start the argument about syllogism (fallacy).
You still need to know what the animal is.
Nothing in your protracted missive makes way for an intelligent discussion. It's no different from your puerile videos.
I have no qualms about instructional MH videos. They are instructional as the word goes, but your videos are just a waste of bandwidth.
No wonder forum members complain about traffic slow down.
You are hogging the speed.
And please don't start the argument about syllogism (fallacy).
You still need to know what the animal is.
Yes, to the damage curve and to make sure inrush will not blow the primary fuse.
Thus I interpret it like this:
40/50/60MVA
40MVA for inrush, while 60MVA is the peak current the trafo will draw.
Inrush is a function of impedance. Actual impedance doesn't change with cooling ratings, but per-unit impedance does. The ratings on the XFMR nameplate are supposed to be per-unit on the ONAN-rated kVA base. When you plot the inrush point on a TCC, use the ONAN kVA rating and impedance.