I didn't find but it will lose disconnecting means for panel DPEM3.Where have you looked in the NEC?
I don't see a problem with this arrangement. The 400 amp feeder breaker protects the bus in this panel board and serves as a disconnecting means if needed. The code never requires a main breaker to my knowledge.I didn't find but it will lose disconnecting means for panel DPEM3.
They are in the same building but not in the same room. Other panel's main breaker is available but only this panel main breaker is missing. I didn't know the reason and don't know if this isolation code. Thanks !Are both panels in the same building. If so I agree with petersonra
Thanks!I don't see a problem with this arrangement. The 400 amp feeder breaker protects the bus in this panel board and serves as a disconnecting means if needed. The code never requires a main breaker to my knowledge.
408.36 Overcurrent Protection. In addition to the requirement of 408.30, a panelboard shall be protected by an overcurrent protective device having a rating not greater than that of the panelboard. This overcurrent protective device shall be located within or at any point on the supply side of the panelboard.
This is clear for me now. But I prefer to put main breaker inside this panel to easy disconnection and miantenance this panel. Thanks!Here's the relevant code section. The OCPD can be at the origin of the feeder and is not required to be in the panelboard.
That's a common reason for MCB's in panels but it's a design issue not a code issue. I've seen value engineering where they remove the 400 amp main in the panel to save the cost of a 400 amp CB.This is clear for me now. But I prefer to put main breaker inside this panel to easy disconnection and miantenance this panel. Thanks!
And I agree with thatThis is clear for me now. But I prefer to put main breaker inside this panel to easy disconnection and miantenance this panel. Thanks!