After having a CMP member correct me years ago I began requiring all areas covered by Art 517.13 (Patient Care) that were subject to personal contact be wired with a method incorporating an equipment ground in a metallic raceway which is an approved ground return path also. This eliminated "standard" (interlocking) MC as acceptable.
I am aware the those areas above 7-1/2 ft and switches outside the patient care vicinity did not require the "redundant" grounding of both an insulated conductor and a "approved" s metal raceway.
I was under the belief that "standard" (interlocking) MC was acceptable in those areas as it is an approved grounding means per Art 250.118, but, in more in-depth reading it appears that is not the case. In that the sheath "itself" (key word from 517) is not a grounding means, MC can not be used
in these "exceptional" areas either, even though a 6 ft flexible conduit "whip" without insulated ground would be acceptable.
Am I correct on this ?
I am aware the those areas above 7-1/2 ft and switches outside the patient care vicinity did not require the "redundant" grounding of both an insulated conductor and a "approved" s metal raceway.
I was under the belief that "standard" (interlocking) MC was acceptable in those areas as it is an approved grounding means per Art 250.118, but, in more in-depth reading it appears that is not the case. In that the sheath "itself" (key word from 517) is not a grounding means, MC can not be used
in these "exceptional" areas either, even though a 6 ft flexible conduit "whip" without insulated ground would be acceptable.
Am I correct on this ?