meeting room floor outlets - "or fraction thereof"

malachi constant

Senior Member
Location
Minneapolis
210.65 Meeting Rooms (B)(2) Floor Outlets states:
A meeting room with any floor dimension that is 12 ft or greater in any direction and that has a floor area of at least 215 SF shall have at least one floor receptacle outlet, or at least one floor outlet to serve receptacles, located at a distance not less than 6 ft from any fixed wall for each 215 SF or fraction thereof.
^^^ note that per 210.65(A) the above does not apply for rooms over 1000 SF.

What the Sam Hill does that mean? Let's use a 20' x 15' meeting room as an example.
* Room is 300 SF, so we are in the 215 < SF < 1000 sweet spot where "floor receptacle outlets" are required.
* I will be installing a floor BOX, quantities as required until code is satisfied.
* Assume no whips to furniture - the receptacles will be mounted within the floor box.
* I need one floor box for sure, since we are over 215 SF.
* It/they will need to be at least six feet away from all walls.
* Do I need two floor boxes? One "outlet" for the first 215 SF, and a second "outlet" for the next 85 SF (the "fraction thereof").
* The rub is, if it is 214 SF you don't need a floor outlet. If it is 215 SF you need one floor outlet. If it is 216 SF you need...two? (One for the first 215 SF and a second for the 216th SF / the "fraction thereof" of the other half of the room?)

I have taken the approach that:
*<215 SF = zero
* exactly 215 SF = 1
* exactly 430 clearly requires two
* there is some gray area as to when you have to go from one to two, as fraction thereof sounds like you should be rounding up.
* Surely "216 SF means two" is not the common sense answer (because 214->0, 215->1, 216->2 is stupid).
* So, arbitrarily, I'll do 1 from 215-250. Then use round numbers: 2 from 250-400; 3 from 401-600; 4 from 601-800; and 5 from 801-1000 SF. (1001 = zero required.)
* But I feel like I could get busted by an inspector for only putting one in a 245 SF room. "Sure, you have one, but that only covers your first 215 SF, what about the second for the "fraction thereof" of the rest of the room?"

Aside from the "how many floor receptacle outlets" are required there is the question of "does a floor box with a quad count as two floor receptacle outlets?" Or do you need two distinct floor boxes to get to two floor receptacle outlets? That doesn't really clarify the math logic of how many are required, but putting multiple duplexes in one floor box at least minimizes the cost of rounding up.

I understand the intent of the code but I don't understand the details. Has anyone else had to put enough thought into this where you can be of assistance here? I looked in NEC 2026 and it doesn't get clarified there. Thanks in advance.
 
This thread (link below) talks about quantities. I'm not sure that it gets to a place of unified agreement but I agree with post #11 that says: "The definition of 'Receptacle Outlet' in article 100 is 'An outlet where one or more receptacles are installed.' So one duplex receptacle on one branch circuit is just one receptacle outlet."

Meaning, if you have a meeting room of 430 SF, you need two floor boxes - you can't get away with one floor box with a quad or whatever.

I consider that part settled, but maybe could be talked out of it. If we assume it is settled, then we can get back to my main question of how do you deal with the "or fraction thereof" part?

 
The 2020 NEC says "or major portion of floor space." This got "clarified" in the 2023 NEC Second Draft to "or fraction thereof" per Second Revision No. 8067.

The panel statement for that change was "The phrase “or major portion of floor space” is replaced with “or fraction thereof” to show that the requirement is to have one floor outlet for each 20 sq. m (215 sq. ft) meeting room space or smaller."

So I see two possibilities: (1) they really did mean any fraction greater than zero, so 0-214 sq ft = 0 required, 215 sq ft = 1 required, 216- 430 sq ft = 2 required, etc. Or (2) this wasn't meant to be a change, and the word "major" got inadvertently dropped, so 215-322 sq ft = 1 required, 323 - 538 sq ft = 2, etc.

I have no opinion on which one was the intention, but (1) is the literal meaning of what they've written.

BTW, there were no PIs or PCs regarding "or fraction thereof" for the 2026 NEC.

Cheers, Wayne
 
Wayne, under the 2020 code you are saying that "major portion" could/should be construed to mean "greater than 50%"? At first I thought the 322 in your "215-322 SF" was arbitrary, but you are getting that with the equation 215 + (215/2) = 322. That is a more mathematical approach than my 215-250 SF; 251-400 SF etc.

I am going to pivot to that for my way of interpreting it. It's unfortunate they took out the "major" language, but I can't get to a place of interpretation where 214->0; 215->1; 216->2. And I was making up numbers for where "2" should start. I like the "major" angle.

If anyone else has thoughts please jump in to share!
 
Top