Fred B
Senior Member
- Location
- Upstate, NY
- Occupation
- Electrician
Needing to move several circuits of wireing due to new cutt-in of a dormer. Will install 2 metal enclosures to splice about 8 circuits and extend the wire around the new opening. How would you recommend bonding of these boxes? 1. Would you add a ground bus to land all the grounds from the NM? 2. Only use one circuit's EGC to bond the box? 3. Run a separate EGC from the enclosures back the panel supplying the circuits, sized to the largest ungrounded conductor? Or something else?
#1 would seem to ensure the enclosure remained bonded no mater what was to later change related to any individual circuit. #2 would be simple but if that circuit was to be disconnected the enclosure would no longer be bonded. #3 would accomplish same goal as #1 ensuring bonding no matter what changes occur to any individual circuit, but the practicality of doing this is a question mark. A single THHN ground would be easy enough to fish through but shouldn't it be in a conduit or flex for the entire run? Is there a MC single conductor cable that would work for #3? Have seen the single MC used as grounding conductor in past but always on very old installation nothing new.
A side thought as to requirements for AFCI. This modification, would that initiate inclusion of AFCI protection if it is not currently present? Seems it would.
#1 would seem to ensure the enclosure remained bonded no mater what was to later change related to any individual circuit. #2 would be simple but if that circuit was to be disconnected the enclosure would no longer be bonded. #3 would accomplish same goal as #1 ensuring bonding no matter what changes occur to any individual circuit, but the practicality of doing this is a question mark. A single THHN ground would be easy enough to fish through but shouldn't it be in a conduit or flex for the entire run? Is there a MC single conductor cable that would work for #3? Have seen the single MC used as grounding conductor in past but always on very old installation nothing new.
A side thought as to requirements for AFCI. This modification, would that initiate inclusion of AFCI protection if it is not currently present? Seems it would.