Mixed conduit types in a parallel feeder - NEC 310.10 (G)(2)

davebrant7

New User
Location
Hunt Valley, MD
Occupation
Engineer
We have a project that will be re-using three 4 inch rigid steel conduits for a new 2000A 480/277V feeder. Two new conduits will be added for a total of five conduits. The new feeder will consist of 5 sets of 600KCMIL THHN conductors with 250KCMIL THHN equipment ground conductors. Can the two additional conduits be steel EMT? Is steel EMT similar enough to steel rigid conduit to be acceptable and not a violation of NEC 310.10 (G)(2)?
 

wwhitney

Senior Member
Location
Berkeley, CA
Occupation
Retired
FWIW, Chapter 9 Table 9 on AC conductor reactance and resistance lumps EMT and rigid steel conduit together. So whatever difference in electrical characteristics they have is below the precision of that Table.

This paper discusses some of the physics involved and does some testing. Primarily in the context of line to conduit faults, which compared to normal operation would accentuate the differences in the conduit, as the conduit is actually half of the circuit. I don't have the background to interpret the information in the paper or to come to a conclusion, but my slightly educated guess is that someone who does would reach the conclusion that they are close enough in electrical characteristics.


Cheers, Wayne

P.S. I guess a related question is what level of "sameness" is required by 310.10(G). If you have a 50' parallel run, and one conductor is 50' while another is 50' 6", does that violate 310.10(G)? If not, then 1% difference is negligible, which is is my guess for an upper bound on the EMT vs Rigid effect.
 

Dennis Alwon

Moderator
Staff member
Location
Chapel Hill, NC
Occupation
Retired Electrical Contractor
Again, this is out of my league but if you look at Mike Holt's fault current calculator these are the choices given for raceway and conductors. Not sure if that is incomplete or if that means there is no electrical difference between emt and rigid as it just has metal raceway.

1716230613271.png
 
Top