Multiwire branch circuit

Status
Not open for further replies.
J

JerryHonolulu

Member
Please explain in detail where and how a multiwire branch circuit may be used. Can the neutral conductor in a 4-wire NM cable (black, red, white, bare ground) be shared between the two energized circuit conductors?
 
Keep in mind the NEC definition to make sure you have the correct circuit in mind:

BraBranch Circuit, Multiwire.

A branch circuit that consists of two or more ungrounded conductors that have a voltage

between them, and a grounded conductor that has equal voltage between it and each ungrounded conductor of the circuit and that is connected to the neutral or grounded conductor of the system.


With changes in recent Code cycles as mentioned in the earlier posts including the requirement that the OCP devices on a MWBC open simultaneously, MWBC are not as popular as they once were since the opening of one phases ovrcurrent device necessitates the other phase(s) opening, one can cause power interruption to a lot of equipment or lighting at one time..
 
rlundsrud said:
Depending on what code cycle you are on, it would also require a 2 pole breaker since you are sharing the neutral.
Click to expand...
While two pole breakers are permitted, they are not required for multiwire circuits. The rule required a common means of disconnect and that can be accomplished using two single pole breakers and a handle tie.
 
The requirements for MWBC are onerous and it may be better to not use.
In addition to a two pole CB you may need to group the neutral and ungrounded conductors in the panel and all junction boxes.

See 200.4(B) and more importantly 210.4(D)
 
tom baker said:
The requirements for MWBC are onerous and it may be better to not use.
In addition to a two pole CB you may need to group the neutral and ungrounded conductors in the panel and all junction boxes.

See 200.4(B) and more importantly 210.4(D)
Click to expand...
Not an issue based on the OP using NM cable.
 
An example of a handle tie for Square D breakers:

(Note, this doesn't turn two breakers into a dual pole [common trip] breaker. It just forces the user to turn off both circuits at the same time).
 

Attachments

  • index.jpg
    index.jpg
    5.6 KB · Views: 1
Some of the changes in requirements in the past 10-15 years on MWBC's are there to protect the untrained IMO.
 
kwired said:
Some of the changes in requirements in the past 10-15 years on MWBC's are there to protect the untrained IMO.
Click to expand...

X2 here and wouldn't be surprised at all if the good old edison circuit eventually bit the dust entirely in residential bcs in a future code passage.
 
In detail:
A three wire plus ground (2 hot, 1 neutral, + ground) MWBC can be used anywhere that you need to run two 120V circuits to the same general area of a building using a shared neutral to both reduce voltage drop and reduce cost. It can be contained in one cable (e.g. NM) or it can be run using separate wires in the same raceway. The source of the circuit described must be a 120/240 single phase three wire panel.
(Other supply schemes and voltages, such as 208Y/120 three phase four wire, can also be used instead, but the MWBC must contain all of the phase wires plus a shared neutral.

If you have two roughly balanced 120V loads, the current in the neutral wire will be small and so the voltage drop seen by the load will be roughly half that seen with two independent neutral 120V circuits.
And you will use less copper.
And for derating the ampacity of wires in a raceway the single three wire MWBC will count as only two current carrying conductors CCCs) while two independent circuits will count as four.
 
GoldDigger said:
In detail:
A three wire plus ground (2 hot, 1 neutral, + ground) MWBC can be used anywhere that you need to run two 120V circuits to the same general area of a building using a shared neutral to both reduce voltage drop and reduce cost. It can be contained in one cable (e.g. NM) or it can be run using separate wires in the same raceway. The source of the circuit described must be a 120/240 single phase three wire panel.
(Other supply schemes and voltages, such as 208Y/120 three phase four wire, can also be used instead, but the MWBC must contain all of the phase wires plus a shared neutral.

If you have two roughly balanced 120V loads, the current in the neutral wire will be small and so the voltage drop seen by the load will be roughly half that seen with two independent neutral 120V circuits.
And you will use less copper.
And for derating the ampacity of wires in a raceway the single three wire MWBC will count as only two current carrying conductors CCCs) while two independent circuits will count as four.
Click to expand...
Great description of MWBC and all their advantages. Pitty they are trying to take them away from us.
 
Gene B said:
An example of a handle tie for Square D breakers:

(Note, this doesn't turn two breakers into a dual pole [common trip] breaker. It just forces the user to turn off both circuits at the same time).
Click to expand...

And by far the worst handle tie on the market...a 6-32 screw, while not identified for the purpose, works much better on the QO breakers as a handle tie than that piece of junk. Their 3 pole one is great, but have no use for the two pole one.
 
electrofelon said:
Why cant you run a 2 phases+neutral MWBC? I know the neutral would count as a CCC but other than that I am not aware of a restriction.
Click to expand...
There is nothing in the code that says you can't use two phases and the grounded conductor from a 3 phase system as a multiwire circuit. The only issue is, as you noted, the grounded conductor is a current carrying conductor.
 
don_resqcapt19 said:
There is nothing in the code that says you can't use two phases and the grounded conductor from a 3 phase system as a multiwire circuit. The only issue is, as you noted, the grounded conductor is a current carrying conductor.
Click to expand...

I agree, otherwise you wouldn't be able to hook up a 1Ø, 120/208 volt dryer or range.
 
GoldDigger said:
Note, however, that there are limitations on putting line to line loads on an MWBC that also supplies line to neutral loads
Click to expand...

iwire said:
Such as?
Click to expand...

I most definitely can be mistaken, but after reading 240.15 a dozen times it appears you might not be able to use a handle tie on a 3 single pole breakers that feed line to line & line to neutral loads
(B-3 only mentions line to line loads on a 3 phase system)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top