Jpflex
Electrician big leagues
- Location
- Victorville
- Occupation
- Electrician commercial and residential
I askwd a similar question a while back but i wanted to ecxpand
First, in 220.61 (C) point 2, makes no sence when NEC mentions NON LINEAR LOADS on a Y neutral system as being a determining factor to dissallow a 70% neutral reduction because point 1 already said ALL 3 phase Y systems with a neutral cannot have its neutral reduced
Second, the 2023 handbook explains that the neutral is considered as a current carrying conductor if the load of the electric discharge lighting, data process lighting or similar equipment on the neutral consist of more than half the total load.
I used to think nec did not allow a 70% reduction of neutral feeder to the anount in excess of 200 amperes, if NON LINEAR LOADS were served or to the portion of non linear loads.
It seems we can apply a 70% reduction to the neutral service or feeder wire in excess of 200 amperes regardless if non linear loads were served and as long as the transformer is not from a 3 phase Y system with ground. Is this correct?
First, in 220.61 (C) point 2, makes no sence when NEC mentions NON LINEAR LOADS on a Y neutral system as being a determining factor to dissallow a 70% neutral reduction because point 1 already said ALL 3 phase Y systems with a neutral cannot have its neutral reduced
Second, the 2023 handbook explains that the neutral is considered as a current carrying conductor if the load of the electric discharge lighting, data process lighting or similar equipment on the neutral consist of more than half the total load.
I used to think nec did not allow a 70% reduction of neutral feeder to the anount in excess of 200 amperes, if NON LINEAR LOADS were served or to the portion of non linear loads.
It seems we can apply a 70% reduction to the neutral service or feeder wire in excess of 200 amperes regardless if non linear loads were served and as long as the transformer is not from a 3 phase Y system with ground. Is this correct?