NEC 83% Rule Liability

Status
Not open for further replies.

00crashtest

Senior Member
Location
California
Occupation
electrician trainee
The National Electric Code allows a service conductor and feeder conductor to be rated at only 83% of the service rating and feeder rating, respectively, as shown in Section 310.15(B)(7) in the 2017 Edition and 310.12 in 2020.

So, the service panels would be rated at 100%. According to the trip curves, the breakers would only trip within the tolerance band, which is roughly 115% to 145% of the rated load for infinite-duration loads, with the nominal trip amount being roughly 125%. Those numbers are a whopping 138.55%, 174.7%, and 150.6% of the service/feeder conductors' ratings.

So, in a rare event where all loads add up to exceed the service/feeder conductor ampacity ratings but are not high enough to trip the breaker, who will be liable? For example, a service/feeder conductor burns out and causes a fire before the breaker trips at 138.55%, 150.6%, or 174.7% of the service/feeder conductor rated ampacity.
 

roger

Moderator
Staff member
Location
Fl
Occupation
Retired Electrician
We're not law experts so we wouldn't know.

From the rules

Rules, Policies, and Disclaimers

No information gathered from this web site shall be treated as being the opinion of an 'expert witness, and you do not have anyone's permission to present such information as evidence in any type of legal dispute.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top