NEC Chapter 9 Table 9

Status
Not open for further replies.
Tainted

Tainted

Senior Member
Location
New York
Occupation
Engineer (PE)
NEC Chapter 9 Table 9 tells you the X and R values for lengths of conductors in PVC/Steel/Aluminum conduits.

What if the conductor is in a wireway. What would be X and R values for that?

Why don't I see it?
 
The resistance depends on conductor cross section area, length, temperature, frequency, and the distance between conductors. The factors which will change the conductor resistance -except the temperature and the length-there are skin effect-depending on frequency-and proximity effect-depending on frequency, conductor diameter and distance between conductors.
Each of these factors influencing on resistance are the same in conduit and cable tray system except the distance between conductors. Since usually proximity effect is small, we may neglect this and consider the same resistance as in conduit. The pipe effect -see Neher and McGrath article-it is not interesting in cable tray, so I think pvc conduit could be considered.
However, the reactance is very influenced by distance. If in a conduit the three phase conductors
are arranged in "cradle" the average distance may be less than as in "flat arrangement" but more than in triangle arrangement, I prefer an average.
 
Sorry.What I wanted to say in the "cradle" it is the average.
 
However, the manufacturer engineering handbook it is better. See calculation way per Okonite catalogueReactance calculation Okonite catalogue.jpg
 
Julius Right said:
However, the manufacturer engineering handbook it is better. See calculation way per Okonite catalogueView attachment 2569349
Click to expand...
I remember studying this stuff on my PE a while ago and doing practice problems lol.

Are there any tables out there showing the effects of the X and R when conductors are in wireway? I need them for short cicuit calculations.

If for example if have copper 500kCMIL THWN-2 wires in 8x8 metal wireway, what are the X and R values per 1000ft would that be?
 
If it's for short circuit calc purposes, why not just use the non-magnetic reactance? You'll be conservative. If the results don't put you into the next size AIC rating, call it a job well done.
 
JoeStillman said:
If it's for short circuit calc purposes, why not just use the non-magnetic reactance? You'll be conservative. If the results don't put you into the next size AIC rating, call it a job well done.
Click to expand...
In theory, what would the worst worst worst case scenario?

Would it be bare non-insulated copper conductors in free air?
 
In order to calculate the maximum, short-circuit currents, according to IEC 60909-0, the resistance of lines(overhead lines and cables) are to be introduced at a temperature of 20oC.
Reactance minimal is then in equilateral triangle case.
IEEE 141/1993 Chapter 4 Short-circuit current calculations
4.5.2 Step 2:Collect and convert impedance dataIEEE 141 short-circuit maximum current.jpg
 
Julius Right said:
In order to calculate the maximum, short-circuit currents, according to IEC 60909-0, the resistance of lines(overhead lines and cables) are to be introduced at a temperature of 20oC.
Reactance minimal is then in equilateral triangle case.
IEEE 141/1993 Chapter 4 Short-circuit current calculations
4.5.2 Step 2:Collect and convert impedance dataView attachment 2569369
Click to expand...
JR, hope you are well...

The answer to the original question is NEC 300.20 is it not ?
If all the feeders or BC's in the wireway are bundled, as they must be, you are back to standard cradle arrangement as Chap 9 Table 9 values are based on.
Your point on "MAX" is based on COLD START which should always be considered, but the the 20C could be lower dependent upon the application.

Make note that the Chap 9 Table 9 R values are based on 75C conductor temp, or basically the cable operating at its fully rated ampacity.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top