For Further Information
All questions or other communications relating to NFPA Documents and all requests for information on NFPA
procedures governing its codes and standards development process, including information on the procedures for
requesting Formal Interpretations, for proposing Tentative Interim Amendments, and for proposing revisions to
NFPA documents during regular revision cycles, should be sent to NFPA headquarters, addressed to the attention
of the Secretary, Standards Council, NFPA, 1 Batterymarch Park, P.O. Box 9101, Quincy, MA 02269-9101; email:
stds_admin@nfpa.org
For more information about NFPA, visit the NFPA website at www.nfpa.org.
Which has the same value as an opinion posted on this forum. Short of an FI, the only opinion that really counts is that of the AHJ....
If you are looking for an informal interpretation you could always talk to a member of the code making panel that covers the section you are interested in.
...
Chris
You would get as good an informal interpretation just by stating the particular Code section and the issue of debate here... :happyyes:..informal interpretation of a particular code section? ...
+1Which has the same value as an opinion posted on this forum. Short of an FI, the only opinion that really counts is that of the AHJ.
Which has the same value as an opinion posted on this forum. Short of an FI, the only opinion that really counts is that of the AHJ.
Which has the same value as an opinion posted on this forum. Short of an FI, the only opinion that really counts is that of the AHJ.
Especially if the member voted against the change that created the ruleBut it can be very enlightening to talk to a CMP member in regards to an interpretation of a code section.
Chris