bphgravity
Senior Member
- Location
- Florida
I thought the term "neutral" was going to be defined in the 2005. I don't see it. Did this get dumped in the comment stage or by the standards council?
It was placed on hold for additional study as a result of comment 1-145.Neutral Conductor. A conductor, other than a grounding conductor, that is connected to the common point of a wye connection in a polyphase system or the point of a symmetrical system that is normally at zero voltage. [ROP 1?122]
DonComment on Proposal No: 1-122
Recommendation: This proposal should be held.
Substantiation: Since the term ?neutral? is used in many sections of the NEC, the CMP 2 task group requests that the proposal be held for broader discussion by the various code-making panels involved. This comment was submitted by
a task group of CMP 2.
Panel Meeting Action: Accept
CMP 1 understands that by accepting this comment, Proposal 1-122 will be held until the 2008 cycle of the NEC.
Panel Statement: The panel recognizes that the definition it accepted in Proposal 1-122 is problematic when considering the many comments received. Some of the comments present new material that has not had public review. In order to properly address a definition of ?neutral conductor,? the panel will form a task group from CMP's 2, 4, 5 and 13 to review all the comments related to Proposal
?Discuss??Originally posted by stars13bars2:something to disgust
