Meterman Eng
Member
- Location
- WA
I am new to the trade (please forgive if I misuse terms, as corrected I will use the right terms) and have a question about the neutral connection of a basic appliancy (a 240V dryer). I think this still is debated...
The dryer receptacle is 4 terminal: 240Vac (+120V to neutral, and -120V to neutral). One terminal is ground.
The appliance is wired with the neutral bonded to the ground (it is labelled on the machine). This puts the neutral return path in parallel with the effective-ground-fault-current path. As such, any neutral current will split between the neutral conductor and the grounding conductor (so if it were protected by GFCI breaker, it would most likely trip).
As I learn the NEC more, it seems that electricians rightfully seperate the neutral and the ground paths, but tie them together at the service point.
What are people's thoughts and comments about this? It seems like it would be better to remove the jumper (inside the machine) that connects neutral to ground, then connect ground to ground and neutral to neutral, removing the parallel path for return current.
The dryer receptacle is 4 terminal: 240Vac (+120V to neutral, and -120V to neutral). One terminal is ground.
The appliance is wired with the neutral bonded to the ground (it is labelled on the machine). This puts the neutral return path in parallel with the effective-ground-fault-current path. As such, any neutral current will split between the neutral conductor and the grounding conductor (so if it were protected by GFCI breaker, it would most likely trip).
As I learn the NEC more, it seems that electricians rightfully seperate the neutral and the ground paths, but tie them together at the service point.
What are people's thoughts and comments about this? It seems like it would be better to remove the jumper (inside the machine) that connects neutral to ground, then connect ground to ground and neutral to neutral, removing the parallel path for return current.