joe tedesco
Senior Member
- Location
- Boston, Massachusetts
But .... shouldn't expansion fittings have been installed here?
See 300.5(J)
See 300.5(J)

IMO, that would be a call by the AHJ based on the climate and soil conditions of the area in which the service is built. I have never seen an expansion coupling on an underground service in the area in which I work.(Houston and surrounding counties)shouldn't expansion fittings have been installed here
I was wondering the same thing. I would guess the meters on the right are an original service, and the meters on the left are an addition. (guessing by the colors of the labels and wireways).p.s. How come he didnt line up the meters on right?
But does this installation meet the NEC rules?This is by agreement between IPL and the city of Indianapolis. The PVC under the junction cabinet are placed acording to IPL specifications for IPL cables.
What does this mean??The remaining portions are between the EC and the AHJ.
Charlie:Originally posted by charlie:
Joe, because it doesn't meet the NEC in total, IPL has met with the city of Indianapolis to get their approval. As far as your second question, that means that we are not the inspectors. The interpretation of the NEC rests with the AHJ. Therefore, "The remaining portions are between the EC and the AHJ."
You can go into any city an pick things apart as you obviously do. That still does not make them wrong since you are an outsider. Section 90-4 is amended in Indiana to read as follows: Requirements covering enforcement, granting of variances, and approval of alternate methods or materials are covered in Indiana statutes and 675 IAC 12, the General Administrative Rules of the Commission.
Sorry Joe, we can do anything we want as long as we (the state of Indiana, the city of Indianapolis, and the entity doing the work) all agree that it is safe.![]()