NJ New payment law

Status
Not open for further replies.

fc

Senior Member
Location
New Jersey
.I see our Governor sign into law on September 1 a new law that requires contractors to get paid in 30 days or the contractors can demand a binding arbitration hearing to enforce their claim. If they win the law awards them the amount they are owed plus interest set at 1% over prime and they can also seek compensation for expense of pursuing the claim.
I hear the only ones that took opposition was the two big builders associations. (lol I wonder why maybe they don't like to pay there bills?)
Anyway I think it is a great law for us. Got to tip my hat to the Governor
 
I see it as a good thing BUT I also see a lot more time in the courts. I don't think it's going to change my customers way of paying 45 to 60 days is the normal and I guess if I want to push the 30 day thing I will lose a customer.
But at least I know if I take a new GC on I can enforce that issue.
 
IMHO
The law is worthless window dressing & a political way to maybe get the small subs vote next election.

All it means is you can start an arbitration complaint process in 30 days. then you can wait another 90 days for the scheduled arbtration to get rescheduled for another month. then days before your next arbitration meeting you get an out of court settlement offer for the original amount. So you can still fight the 1% if you want.
 
There are some GCs I've dealt with that are so rotten, if they offered me cash I'd still ask for a picture ID
 
The new Law,
Once both sides agree on the bill, the property owner would have an additional 10 days to settle up. The total period between presentation of the bill and payment cannot exceed 30 days. Contractors can begin charging interest once the one-month deadline passes. Previously, the deadline was 60 days.
 
satcom said:
The new Law,
Once both sides agree on the bill, the property owner would have an additional 10 days to settle up. The total period between presentation of the bill and payment cannot exceed 30 days. Contractors can begin charging interest once the one-month deadline passes. Previously, the deadline was 60 days.
The key phrase here is ".... once both sides agree on the bill...."

I can see the scum bags disputing your (final) bill, thus tying up your money in litigation or arbitration as long as possible.
 
This was an article that was published in the Bergen Record on Sept. 12th :

Tuesday, September 12, 2006

The Bergen Record
By HUGH R. MORLEY
STAFF WRITER



For building contractors, "the check will be in the mail" is no longer
enough.

A new law requires property owners and developers to pay construction
contractors and subcontractors within 30 days of the time they submit an
invoice for the work done.


The law gives a developer or property owner 20 days from the date an invoice

is submitted to determine whether the work is acceptable. If it is, payment
is due within 10 more days, according to the law.

Contractors who aren't paid in a timely fashion can demand a binding
arbitration hearing to enforce their claim. If they win, the new law awards
them the amount they are owed plus interest - set at one percentage point
above the prime rate. They can also seek compensation for the expense of
pursuing the claim.

The law, which was signed by Governor Corzine on Sept. 1, has divided the
construction community and the political parties. Two big builders'
associations took opposing positions. And Democrats in the Legislature
backed the law, while most Republicans opposed it.

Corzine signed the law at a Labor Day observance. "When project funds flow
promptly, bottlenecks are eliminated, projects run smoothly and everyone
from subcontractors to laborers gets paid on time," the governor said.

Yet a few weeks earlier, his transportation commissioner, Kris Kolluri,
testified against the bill. Kolluri said he was concerned that the rigidity
may cause the loss of federal funding.

Though the bill was changed to exempt federally-funded projects in that
situation, Senate Republicans said Kolluri's unease made them uncomfortable
with the measure, according to Sen. Leonard Lance, R-Hunterdon.

The law took effect immediately, but does not apply to contracts entered
into before Sept. 1.

Prior to the changes, the so-called "prompt payment law" did not apply to
property owners and developers. It was mainly a tool to compel prime
contractors to pay their subcontractors in a timely fashion.

Sen. Steve Sweeney, D-Gloucester, who sponsored the bill, said he wrote it
in part to help small contractors who don't have the cash to pay bills and
salaries while awaiting a delayed invoice payment.

"A lot of the little guys go out of business because of it," said Sweeney,
who is also a business agent for an ironworkers union.

The law covers private and public work because government agencies are among

the most tardy payers, he said.

Jack Koscis, CEO of the Building Contractors Association of New Jersey, said

his membership of commercial and industrial contractors -- many of whom do
government work -- strongly supported the law.

"This is a fairness issue," he said. "And most people that don't want to pay

their bills don't see it that way."

He said some of his members, especially those who do public contracts, had
to wait 90 or even 120 days to be paid.

But Patrick O'Keefe, CEO of the New Jersey Builders Association, whose
members predominantly build residential units, said the issue is more
complex. There are legitimate reasons why a builder might delay payment to a

contractor, he said.

For instance, he said, if the municipal housing inspector takes time to
inspect and sign off on work, the builder will delay the payment to
contractors. A developer won't want to pay for work until it's approved, but

the law will require payment anyway, he said.

"We thought the legislation imposed rigidities on a rather fluid system of
construction," he said. "Those rigidities don't reflect the reality of
day-to-day business."

The state's two biggest trade groups, New Jersey Business and Industry
Association and New Jersey State Chamber of Commerce, said they did not take

a position on the bill because their members did not feel strongly about it.

Michael Egenton, vice president at the Chamber of Commerce, said it appeared

there is enough flexibility in the bill to make it acceptable "if there is
communications and dialogue" between customers and contractors.

********************************************

I agree with most of the others. This is smoke and mirrors. If the chances of you getting paid on time were slim before the bill goes into effect ther're not going to change much afterwards. This bill is primarily for those who do a lot of bid and public work where it is customary to get paid 120 days after you submit an invoice. I'm not a Corzine fan but I give him a thumbs up for trying anyway.
 
"laws" are something the attorneys feed off of!! this bill is so full of holes -- it's a joke! i always contracted my work to G.C.s using the standard archetects agreement. it specified the agreed schedualled method of payment ---- i never had the first G.C. follow it even though he signed the agreement. thats why i stopped working for them!! and at the time i was working for very large G.C.s.. and as they called me for bids on future jobs i told them i wasn't working for them anymore -- they would ask "where are you going to get your work?". i told them i would work for building owners only! it hurt me for awhile. but, for my company, and my peace of mind it was a godsend!!! and for myself and my men --- we had a nice fifteen year "ride". thats what we refered it as. a "ride". never did we look for work! never did we beg people for the money THEY OWED US! the final straw was a final draw on a large multi floor office tenant buildout for turner construction. the punch list was about one inch thick. we did not have one item on the punch list!!! they had a women(and she was from new jersey) comptroller handling the contract payments. they were 60 days overdue from paying my final draw which was over $130,000.. i asked her " when can i expect to be payed". she said "when the punch list is completely done". i explained "we do not have one item on the punch list" which i thought was remarkable!!! her exact words after thinking a bit were "when i F-ing feel like sending it out!". i was taken back by her statement to say the least! i told her "this will be my last job with turner construction" and it was.

working directly for building owners was the best thing that happened. and i know how much worse the G.C.'s are today. many building owners begged us to work in their buildings for their G.C.s and they would guarentee payments on time -- but we never accepted these offers -- just politly declined --said "we had too much work". we entered an area which many electrical contractors don't venture -- specilized in metering, infrared , data , building management systems and variable speed drives.... yes, "it was a good ride"!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top