well, from my point of view, the NFPA has a marketing arm that is about
as fugly as adobe.
speaking of which, my copy of acrobat pro, which retailed for $800,
and i got on sale 5 years ago for $400, quit working with the latest
OSX version, catalina.
it couldn't hang with 64 bit. i was more than a bit miffed, as i absolutely
find acrobat pro indispensable in my work. so, with much profanity, i signed
up for $15 a month, forever, to use software i already paid for.
however, upon looking at the new version...... my printer has a dual side
scanner that adobe will control, and scan, and create a searchable .pdf
of anything i feed into it. the new version is pretty powerful, and will do
stuff my old version would not do.
and i use a legally purchased .pdf of the current code, as it's searchable
on a pad.
and if someone had to buy a loose bound copy of the code to make their own .pdf,
so they can search it on their pad, well, the technology is certainly there.
acrobat pro also has the ability to strip out metadata from a .pdf, so you
cannot see who, or what authored the .pdf...... for those unaware, embedded
metadata in a .pdf header can show the creator of the document.
not that i would ever consider doing anything illegal, or encouraging anyone
else to do anything illegal, but i strongly suspect that .pdf copies of the NEC
will propagate in the wild, should NFPA decide not to provide them for sale.
actually, strongly suspect is a little weak. i'd call it a certainty. and something
that can be sent in 40 seconds attached to an email, to 200 people, should
convince the NFPA that selling a reasonably priced copy of the .pdf means
that honest people will have a chance to remain honest.
so, the appeal would go like this:
"Please, dear NFPA, don't deprive us of one of the few remaining opportunities
in America to be honest, and pay for something of value we receive. For if
you deprive us of the opportunity to be honest, the opportunity will not be offered
again to you."