non licensed contractors

Status
Not open for further replies.

kennym

Member
Location
New Jersey
I was recently informed that A/V home automation contractors were installing crestron/AMX control systems with a 24vdc power wiring to touchpanels, room controllers, and other equipment. In NJ anyone wiring over 10 volts must be a lic. contractor or have F/A contractor exception.

These A/V contractors are in violation of NJ Statute, but continue to do this work. Does anyone have similar experiences?
 
Re: non licensed contractors

Does anyone have similar experiences?
Similar experiences?. Well yeah, in my area the landscapers are out there performing service upgrades, the carpenters say "I've seen them sparky's do this plenty of times, we don't need to pay them big money to run this stuff". And the "handyman" drives a brand new truck with an expensive graphic on the side advertising electrical repairs.
 
Re: non licensed contractors

I don't pay much attention to the low-voltage side of things since I don't do that kind of work, but I've seen plenty of handymen and others advertising electrical work despite not having the required electrical contractor's license. It took a lot of time, effort, and money for me to become a licensed EC, and I really don't think I should have to compete with people who aren't properly licensed.

Those ads often find their way to the proper authorities at the state board when I'm in the neighborhood. They very much appreciate my efforts, and I know it has an effect. I've seen plenty of these ads disappear after I turn them in.
 
Re: non licensed contractors

I used to get all upset about these people but now I don't care anymore. They will always exsist and there isn't much I can do about it. Besides that, I have enough of my own troubles to worry about than what some "hackyman" or a/v company is doing.

Furthermore, most inspection departments in this area are stretched so thin just trying to keep up with the legitimate contractors. There is tons of work going on but no new inspectors being added. And I know of some inspectors who turn a blind eye to unlicensed and/or questionable work anyway.
 
Re: non licensed contractors

I agree with you Peter, but I still like to blow off steam about it here. Could you just imagine what outcry if handymen could get away with this same thing on commercial jet aircraft?
 
Re: non licensed contractors

Originally posted by macmikeman:
I agree with you Peter, but I still like to blow off steam about it here. Could you just imagine what outcry if handymen could get away with this same thing on commercial jet aircraft?
Nothing wrong with blowing off some steam about this. :) I used to do it too. But then I realized how pointless it is considering that nothing was/is being done about it.

Bottom line, if our industry took licensing, certification and inspections as seriously as the aviation and medical industries, we wouldn't be having this discussion.
 
Re: non licensed contractors

Originally posted by peter d:
Originally posted by macmikeman:
I agree with you Peter, but I still like to blow off steam about it here. Could you just imagine what outcry if handymen could get away with this same thing on commercial jet aircraft?
Nothing wrong with blowing off some steam about this. :) I used to do it too. But then I realized how pointless it is considering that nothing was/is being done about it.

Bottom line, if our industry took licensing, certification and inspections as seriously as the aviation and medical industries, we wouldn't be having this discussion.
Unfortunately, I think it would have to take a tragedy two for that to happen. Since we don't often hear about people getting killed or houses burning down because of hack wiring (at least not around my area), the public isn't exactly up in arms about demanding the authorities do something about it.

In the medical and aviation industries, it's much more likely something very bad will happen if unqualified people do those jobs. No surprise that those industries take licensing/inspections much more seriously than ours does.

Believe it or not, there was recently a local news item about how the authorities were going after a woman who was operating a business doing traditional African hair braiding without a proper barber or cosmetology license. Last I heard, she argued that she didn't need one, since she doesn't cut or dye hair. Good to know the hair police are out there protecting the public...
 
Re: non licensed contractors

I'm sorry to hear that some of those other states are very lax in enforcing their laws or even having licensure requirements.
Here in NJ, we take it seriously.

This topic was touched upon in the Request for Hacks, posted on July 22, 2005.

I'll re-iterate some of my comments for kennym's benefit.

Originally posted by celtic:
]NJ has a different approach...the Board has control over all electrical installations/installers - licensed EC or wanna-be.
NJ has discovered that fining the wanna-be is a lucrative business.

Read the minutes from a few of their meetings:
BoEoEC Minutes page

Here is a "quickee":
Check in the amount of $1,000.00 received from xxxx, License #xxxx, as the second installment of a civil penalty, and costs, in the amount of $31,110.78 for violation of N.J.S.A. 45:5A-9 and N.J.S.A. 56:8-1 et seq. Payments started November 17, 2004 and the balance due is $25,110.78.
$31,110 !!!
(45:5A-9. Necessity of business permit and license; qualifications; examinations; fees )
(56:8-1 Definitions. 1. (a) The term "advertisement" shall include the attempt directly or indirectly)

Looks like he was licensed but possessed no business permit...and he is just one of many with fines ranging from $500 to the whopper $31k.
Originally posted by celtic:
In NJ, they can be reported and usually end up paying a fine (see my link to the minutes page, above).

Why an EC doesn't take out a required permit completely eludes me...it doesn't save the EC any money - ok, maybe a few bucks for the time spent filing and inspection time...but once branded as a no-permit-EC what has been gained? The eye of the AHJ et al.
The licensure requirement for a LV EC is actually a "non-license" - an exemption: Application for Telecommunications Wiring Exemption . The fact is, it is a REQUIREMENT for any work under 10V.

If you want, you can use this Complaint Form.
As an EC in NJ, you have a "duty" to "police" the work being done. You have spent a great deal of time, money, and effort to obtain your EC's license. Allowing a non-licensed/exempt person to conduct business is accepting the fact that you have wasted a great deal of time, money, and effort obtained your EC credential - and are also willing to throw more time, money, and effort out the window in maintaining your EC credentials. License renewal fees, insurance, bonding, CCE, etc does cost time, money, and effort. Statutes

You can decide to take an active stance and use the Complaint Form, or you can take a more passive stance and slip a copy of the State Board of Examiners of Electrical Contractors Consumer Tip under the "contractors" windshield and one under the customer's door.

An anonymus call to the AHJ would NOT be out of line. The AHJs don't want these "contractors" running around either. I have recieved numerous calls from HO's stating that needed a licensed EC now, as they were facing fines from the AHJ for trying to slip one past them. I approach the AHJ before signing a contract with these types of people. The AHJ appreciates the fact that I am "on the job", and it establishes that I do not do work w/o the required permits. The AHJ also tells me exactly what must be done. (Which saves me some aggrivation)

Some HO's claim it's all BS just to get the permit fees (and may even imply that the AHJ and I are in bed), but the law is the law and it when it comes to feeding my family (or my vehicles with outrageously priced fuel) or turning a blind eye (and having an empty wallet) the choice is obvious.

This is MY opinion and I'll throw any HO or "contractor" under a bus to prove my point and feed what needs feeding.
 
Re: non licensed contractors

Here in Indiana It's hand's off on home owners doing there own work. See (d) the last paragraph

IC 36-7-8-3
Establishment of building, heating, ventilating, electrical, plumbing, and sanitation standards; ordinances Sec. 3. (a) The legislative body of a county having a county department of buildings or joint city-county building department may, by ordinance, adopt building, heating, ventilating, air conditioning, electrical, plumbing, and sanitation standards for unincorporated areas of the county. These standards take effect only on the legislative body's receipt of written approval from the fire prevention and building safety commission.
(b) An ordinance adopted under this section must be based on occupancy, and it applies to:
(1) the construction, alteration, equipment, use, occupancy, location, and maintenance of buildings, structures, and appurtenances that are on land or over water and are:
(A) erected after the ordinance takes effect; and
(B) if expressly provided by the ordinance, existing when the ordinance takes effect;
(2) conversions of buildings and structures, or parts of them, from one occupancy classification to another; and
(3) the movement or demolition of buildings, structures, and equipment for the operation of buildings and structures.
(c) The rules of the fire prevention and building safety commission are the minimum standards upon which ordinances adopted under this section must be based.
(d) An ordinance adopted under this section does not apply to private homes that are built by individuals and used for their own occupancy.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top