Question 1.
Note (4) in Chapter 9 of NEC 2011:
"Where conduit or tubing nipples having a maximum length not to exceed 24 in. are installed between boxes, cabinets, and similar enclosures, the nipples shall be permitted to be filled to 60 percent of their total cross-sectional area, and 310.15(B)(3)(a) adjustment factors need not apply to this condition."
Can this be applied to a reducer? For example, if you have a cable that requires a 3 1/2" conduit when using the 1 Wire 53% column, and the peckerhead on the motor will only accept a 3" conduit, can you apply the 60% fill rule for a 3 1/2 - 3" reducer?
Question 2.
Note (7) in Chapter 9 of NEC 2011:
"When calculating the maximum number of conductors permitted in a conduit or tubing, all of the same size, the next higher whole number shall be used to determine the maximum number of conductors permitted when the calculation results in a decimal of 0.8 or larger."
Does this only apply to the Over 2 Wires column?
Note (4) in Chapter 9 of NEC 2011:
"Where conduit or tubing nipples having a maximum length not to exceed 24 in. are installed between boxes, cabinets, and similar enclosures, the nipples shall be permitted to be filled to 60 percent of their total cross-sectional area, and 310.15(B)(3)(a) adjustment factors need not apply to this condition."
Can this be applied to a reducer? For example, if you have a cable that requires a 3 1/2" conduit when using the 1 Wire 53% column, and the peckerhead on the motor will only accept a 3" conduit, can you apply the 60% fill rule for a 3 1/2 - 3" reducer?
Question 2.
Note (7) in Chapter 9 of NEC 2011:
"When calculating the maximum number of conductors permitted in a conduit or tubing, all of the same size, the next higher whole number shall be used to determine the maximum number of conductors permitted when the calculation results in a decimal of 0.8 or larger."
Does this only apply to the Over 2 Wires column?