petersonra
Senior Member
- Location
- Northern illinois
- Occupation
- engineer
why would one need to pound a rod next to two 3" chunks of conduit going underground? seems pretty redundant to me.
Does the conduit continue in metal form for a distance of 8' underground? I can't tell from herepetersonra said:why would one need to pound a rod next to two 3" chunks of conduit going underground? seems pretty redundant to me.
brian john said:more can't hurt can it?
A/A Fuel GTX said:The two 3" conduits aren't considered a grounding electrode......
480sparky said:No conduits are. 250.53 does not list any raceways.
iwire said:Check out 250.52(A)(5)(a). :smile:
Of course it would still have to meet 250.53(G).
It doesn't say that conduit has to be used exclusively as an electrode.A/A Fuel GTX said:Yeah but the way I interpret 250.52 (A)(5) is a conduit exclusively driven to be an electrode. Not a conduit used as a raceway.
A/A Fuel GTX said:Sure but common sense tells me that having an electrode that contains service conductors or feeders wouldn't be a great thing during a lightning strike....
Sure but common sense tells me that having an electrode that contains service conductors or feeders wouldn't be a great thing during a lightning strike....
By making sure it only comes out at night? :wink:brian john said:How would you keep lighting off this conduit?
By making it illegal per "the code"?brian john said:How would you keep lighting off this conduit?
Especially when the lawyer is only buried up to his neck.:smile:iaov said:...you realy can't have too much ground.:smile: